Audiovisual Identity Database:Requests for Comment/ReplaceText failures template: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
||
[[Category:RFCs closed in 2024]] |
[[Category:RFCs closed in 2024]] |
||
{{Archive bottom}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 16:21, 25 May 2024
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
ReplaceText failures template
A lot of you may know that ReplaceText can sometimes bring in some comedy gold, especially the way it replaces POV terms such as "we see". diberhaze suggested in the Discord server that a template for ReplaceText failures may be needed. Gilby1385 (talk) 11:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Support
Abstain
Abstain The reason the Section Misuse template worked was because of the ease of implementation. With one ReplaceText job, many of the phrases misusing Technique or adding a subjective legacy would be tagged for misuse. This is because most of the time, they have a common phrase that ties them all. For this though, there are many different ways that a "we see" comment can be followed with incorrect grammar, so much so that a job to automatically tag them all would be inefficient, and it would be way easier to just edit out the grammar error via a page edit rather than just tagging it and not doing anything about it. Compooper (talk) 22:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
Comment: Staff needs to vote on this RfC, it has been almost 2 weeks. 
(That guy who edits the Disney Home Video Bumpers pages) 17:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
