AVID:Requests for Comment/Replace all mentions of UK's Fair Dealing system with the US's Fair Use system: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archive top|Closing as {{approved|passed}} [[User:Logoarto|Logoarto]] ([[User talk:Logoarto|talk]]) 14:08, 30 September 2023 (UTC)}} |
|||
==Comparison== |
==Comparison== |
||
Fair dealing applies only to those uses or exceptions mentioned in the law. However, under fair use, the list is illustrative and very subjective. Fair dealing has a narrower scope compared to fair use as fair dealing can be applied only for the given purposes, while fair use should only pass the test of fairness even if used for a purpose not specified. Fair use is flexible and adaptable to changes leading to uncertainty. Fair dealing exceptions have been argued to be uncertain as well, especially terms such as ‘parody’ and ‘satire’ are not defined by law and there exists few case laws on the same. |
Fair dealing applies only to those uses or exceptions mentioned in the law. However, under fair use, the list is illustrative and very subjective. Fair dealing has a narrower scope compared to fair use as fair dealing can be applied only for the given purposes, while fair use should only pass the test of fairness even if used for a purpose not specified. Fair use is flexible and adaptable to changes leading to uncertainty. Fair dealing exceptions have been argued to be uncertain as well, especially terms such as ‘parody’ and ‘satire’ are not defined by law and there exists few case laws on the same. |
||
| Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
===Support=== |
===Support=== |
||
#{{Support}} Could do, I guess. [[User:Gilby1385|Gilby1385]] ([[User talk:Gilby1385|talk]]) 13:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Support}} Could do, I guess. [[User:Gilby1385|Gilby1385]] ([[User talk:Gilby1385|talk]]) 13:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC) |
||
#{{Support}} Just for the first reasoning alone. [[User:Rainbow Puppy|Rainbow Puppy]] ([[User talk:Rainbow Puppy|talk]]) 16:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
#{{Support}} Good. [[User:Ashley Taylor|Ashley Taylor ft. Cure Finale (soulbond friend) and CW/RB (account manager w/ shared pet)]] ([[User talk:Ashley Taylor|talk]]) 02:02, 25 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
| Line 22: | Line 25: | ||
::OK. Close if needed. Will post to forms if not resolved unless I change template naming. [[File:JrStudiosprofile.png|150px|link=User:JrStudios]]([[User talk:JrStudios|What you gonna do when clip-ons come for you!?]]) 12:55, 22 September 2023 (UTC) |
::OK. Close if needed. Will post to forms if not resolved unless I change template naming. [[File:JrStudiosprofile.png|150px|link=User:JrStudios]]([[User talk:JrStudios|What you gonna do when clip-ons come for you!?]]) 12:55, 22 September 2023 (UTC) |
||
__NOTOC__ |
__NOTOC__ |
||
{{Archive bottom}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 14:08, 30 September 2023
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Comparison
Fair dealing applies only to those uses or exceptions mentioned in the law. However, under fair use, the list is illustrative and very subjective. Fair dealing has a narrower scope compared to fair use as fair dealing can be applied only for the given purposes, while fair use should only pass the test of fairness even if used for a purpose not specified. Fair use is flexible and adaptable to changes leading to uncertainty. Fair dealing exceptions have been argued to be uncertain as well, especially terms such as ‘parody’ and ‘satire’ are not defined by law and there exists few case laws on the same.
Why?
1. WikiForge is an American wikifarm. We do not need to go by the British Fair Dealing system.
2. Fair use is more flexible and subjective.
(What you gonna do when clip-ons come for you!?) 18:09, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support Could do, I guess. Gilby1385 (talk) 13:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC)- Support Just for the first reasoning alone. Rainbow Puppy (talk) 16:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support Good. Ashley Taylor ft. Cure Finale (soulbond friend) and CW/RB (account manager w/ shared pet) (talk) 02:02, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
Comment: Shouldn't need an RFC. should have just been a quick mention in the forums, as we kind of have to switch over due to being on an American platform. Eternity Media Group (talk) 00:12, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- Mainly used the RfC to get people talking as I don't have access to AVIDcord, even though I want to go through an appeal process (What you gonna do when clip-ons come for you!?) 01:35, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- just use the on-wiki forums. Eternity Media Group (talk) 04:08, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- OK. Close if needed. Will post to forms if not resolved unless I change template naming. (What you gonna do when clip-ons come for you!?) 12:55, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- Mainly used the RfC to get people talking as I don't have access to AVIDcord, even though I want to go through an appeal process
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
