AVID:Requests for Comment/Restructure the RfC Voting System: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
→Oppose (1): Reply |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archive top|Closing with the following conclusions: |
|||
*Proposal 1: Passed |
|||
*Proposal 2: Failed |
|||
''[[User:Logohub|<span style="font-size: 120%;"><span style="font-family:'serif';">Logohub</span></span>]]'' ([[User talk:Logohub|talk]]) 02:49, 22 January 2023 (UTC)}} |
|||
I feel like, with the current RfC system, there isn't a clear reason for "strongest support" and other variations to exist, for as far as I'm aware, they only count as 1 point. I am going to make 2 proposals here for potential improvements to the system. |
I feel like, with the current RfC system, there isn't a clear reason for "strongest support" and other variations to exist, for as far as I'm aware, they only count as 1 point. I am going to make 2 proposals here for potential improvements to the system. |
||
[[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 12:19, 13 January 2023 (UTC) |
[[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 12:19, 13 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
Line 23: | Line 28: | ||
#:::Forgive me, I just see this as one of the areas of the wiki where a far more professional, serious approach should be taken, seeing as these votes can completely alter the wiki in one way or another. The massive comments take away from this, and I want to see them removed at this point. [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 14:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC) |
#:::Forgive me, I just see this as one of the areas of the wiki where a far more professional, serious approach should be taken, seeing as these votes can completely alter the wiki in one way or another. The massive comments take away from this, and I want to see them removed at this point. [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 14:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
#:I take it you're not a Sonic fan? [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 05:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC) |
#:I take it you're not a Sonic fan? [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 05:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
#::i am lmao [[File:NLiteChannel.jpg|75px|link=User:CalvinWilkerson]] (rebrand coming soon probably) ([[User talk:CalvinWilkerson|The Third Place]]) 13:32, 17 January 2023 (UTC) |
|||
#:::I was joking. |
|||
#:::So what is your rationale for the oppose anyway? [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 17:47, 18 January 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Comments (1)=== |
===Comments (1)=== |
||
Line 29: | Line 37: | ||
:Not under this proposal, as it defeats the point of removing the others in the first place. [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 14:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC) |
:Not under this proposal, as it defeats the point of removing the others in the first place. [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 14:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
::Actually, it wouldn't as when you do that it still counts as 1 Support, 1 Abstain, and 1 Oppose. [[File:DW Signature.gif|249px|link=User:DanteWilliams]]([[User talk:DanteWilliams|• '''USER TALK!''' •]]) 15:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC) |
::Actually, it wouldn't as when you do that it still counts as 1 Support, 1 Abstain, and 1 Oppose. [[File:DW Signature.gif|249px|link=User:DanteWilliams]]([[User talk:DanteWilliams|• '''USER TALK!''' •]]) 15:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
:::part of the reason of this is to remove the lengthy Intros [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 10:38, 19 January 2023 (UTC) |
|||
==2. Make each level of support/oppose have a point value.== |
==2. Make each level of support/oppose have a point value.== |
||
Line 55: | Line 64: | ||
===Comments (2)=== |
===Comments (2)=== |
||
{{Comment}} According to my [[AVID:Requests for Comment/Outlaw section removal RFCs|Outlaw section removal RFC]], Hibiscus closed it as fail because of the majority of Oppose and Abstains (at first), so clearly they do have some sort of role. Also, don't they decide no consensus? [[File:DW Signature.gif|249px|link=User:DanteWilliams]]([[User talk:DanteWilliams|• '''USER TALK!''' •]]) 00:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC) |
{{Comment}} According to my [[AVID:Requests for Comment/Outlaw section removal RFCs|Outlaw section removal RFC]], Hibiscus closed it as fail because of the majority of Oppose and Abstains (at first), so clearly they do have some sort of role. Also, don't they decide no consensus? [[File:DW Signature.gif|249px|link=User:DanteWilliams]]([[User talk:DanteWilliams|• '''USER TALK!''' •]]) 00:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
{{Archive bottom}} |
|||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
||
[[Category:Passed Requests for Comment]] |
|||
[[Category:Failed Requests for Comment]] |
Latest revision as of 06:04, 28 February 2023