AVID:Requests for Comment/Revise criteria for SNOW closure: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
Created page with "{{subst:RfC Page|Revise criteria for SNOW closure|I've noticed lately that many proposals are being shot down rather quickly due to the snowball clause. I feel like more and more proposals are being closed with under 10 votes and within a single day. So, I'm proposing the following criteria: '''Increase the vote count to trigger a SNOW closure to 15 or more unopposed votes, and have the grace period before that happens be two to three days.''' What do yo..." |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===Support=== |
===Support=== |
||
{{Support}} in the condition that the minimum be lowered to at least 10 or something. I've got a feeling that not many people vote as much st times. The grace period is just as fine though. Two days is enough. Either way, I'm in. <span style="font-family: 'Verdana';">[[User:Doctorine Dark|Doctorine Dark]] <small>([[User talk:Doctorine Dark|talk]])</small></span> 13:06, 6 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
Revision as of 13:06, 6 February 2023
Revise criteria for SNOW closure
I've noticed lately that many proposals are being shot down rather quickly due to the snowball clause. I feel like more and more proposals are being closed with under 10 votes and within a single day. So, I'm proposing the following criteria: Increase the vote count to trigger a SNOW closure to 15 or more unopposed votes, and have the grace period before that happens be two to three days.
What do you think? Compooper (talk) 13:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support in the condition that the minimum be lowered to at least 10 or something. I've got a feeling that not many people vote as much st times. The grace period is just as fine though. Two days is enough. Either way, I'm in. Doctorine Dark (talk) 13:06, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
