AVID:Requests for Comment/Revise criteria for SNOW closure: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
===Oppose=== |
===Oppose=== |
||
{{Oppose}} If we had a bad idea, How would we quickly erase it from existence? [[User:Sonicfan19198282|Sonicfan19198282]] [[Usertalk:Sonicfan19198282|talk]] 13:06, 6 February 2023 |
|||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
Revision as of 13:08, 6 February 2023
Revise criteria for SNOW closure
I've noticed lately that many proposals are being shot down rather quickly due to the snowball clause. I feel like more and more proposals are being closed with under 10 votes and within a single day. So, I'm proposing the following criteria: Increase the vote count to trigger a SNOW closure to 10 or more unopposed votes, and have the grace period before that happens be two to three days.
What do you think? Compooper (talk) 13:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Support
Support in the condition that the minimum be lowered to at least 10 or something. I've got a feeling that not many people vote as much at times. The grace period is just as fine though. Two days is enough. Either way, I'm in. Doctorine Dark (talk) 13:06, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
Oppose If we had a bad idea, How would we quickly erase it from existence? Sonicfan19198282 talk 13:06, 6 February 2023
