Audiovisual Identity Database:Requests for Comment/Scary Logos Section

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing proposal as fail, with no support votes. Sickminecraft45 (talk) 14:36, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Should we add a new section with information about scary logos like the Screen Gems "S from Hell" and the Viacom "V of Doom" etc? Sickminecraft45 (talk) 15:51, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Please close this! This was an experiment that was a bad idea and it got me on the User Reports page claiming me to be 'underage' when I'm 15! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 14:32, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Update: I have decided to close it myself. Sickminecraft45 (talk) 14:36, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Oppose This is what we've been trying to move away from. As AVID has evolved, we've moved away from the concept of 'scary logos', as such a concept is far too subjective, hence why we removed the Scare Factor in 2018. Such a section/category would be a step backwards at this stage. (name change coming soon) 17:27, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
2. Oppose This is just the Scare Factor all over again lmao (The Third Place) 18:48, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
3. Oppose Per all the above votes. One of the reasons why the scare and cheesy factors were discontinued is because their very subjective and would give out opinions others may disagree with. Editor's Notes replaced them, but even then their still subjective which got them replaced with Legacy sections, sections that talk about what is notable in the logo and not opinions. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 20:23, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
4. Oppose Like what others have said, the community has already got rid of the Scare Factors that was abolished in 2018 in favor of Editor's Note, and recently the Legacy. PokeRapMonster (talk) 10:17, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
5. This is pointless, per above. I don't see a point in doing this. --Blad (talk • contribs • global) 14:48, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
6. Absolutely. Not. Strongly Oppose.
   Compooper 15:52, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
7. Oppose No. We have moved away from "scary logos" for the most part because of what other users here have brought up along with the fact that it was making the wiki look like a laughingstock with how overexaggerated, childish and all-around terribly written the Scare Factors usually were. If you want to talk about scary logos, I suggest doing so either on a user page, AVID:What's the scariest logo you've ever seen? or the unaffiliated Scary Logos Wiki on Fandom. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 16:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

   Though given how its an opinionated wiki and Qualitipedia was shutdown for destroying the reception of Miraheze, its unluckily that the Scary Logos Wiki would live longer. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 20:34, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

   This would trigger a reception wiki disaster. Please don't JrStudios (talk) 23:24, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

8. Oppose Per everyone else. · Talk · Edits 21:08, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
9. Oppose Literally this wiki would turn into another cringe scary logos wiki --CD967119 (talk) 22:18, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
10. Oppose Hey kid, Weenie Hut Jr.'s is down the street. 00:31, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
11. Oppose This is the stupidest crap I've ever seen. (My Talk Page) 17:44, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
12. Oppose Logos are stupid --Zdrmonster (talk) 23:21, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

    Why are you here then? (My Talk Page) 13:53, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

    Hey, don't judge the man. If he says logos are stupid, logos are stupid. (lets talks) 14:03, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

13. Oppose What in the world is the reason for continuing to mention scary logos anymore? It's a thing of the past. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 23:57, 21 November 2022 (UTC) IAmThe789Guy
14. Oppose Now I hate to Strongest Oppose something but this would just be straight-up redundant and meaningless (lets talks) 14:05, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
15. Oppose
    DEAR GOD NO.
    ★ Nova (talk) 14:35, 22 November 2022 (UTC)