AVID:Requests for Comment/Separate 1953 and 1956 TCF logos: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
imported>Blad |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa"> |
|||
:The following discussion is closed. '''Please do not modify it'''. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
|||
::Closing as '''passed''', with a majority of support votes. ''[[User:Logohub|<span style="font-size: 120%;"><span style="font-family:'serif';">Logohub</span></span>]]'' ([[User talk:Logohub|talk]]) 14:05, 8 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
Should we separate the 1953 and 1956 [[20th Century Studios|20th Century Fox]] logos? I ran a poll on the forums and all votes said yes. So should we do it? |
Should we separate the 1953 and 1956 [[20th Century Studios|20th Century Fox]] logos? I ran a poll on the forums and all votes said yes. So should we do it? |
||
| Line 15: | Line 19: | ||
*:Let's do it! [[User:Sickminecraft45|Sickminecraft45]] ([[User talk:Sickminecraft45|talk]]) 13:13, 5 November 2022 (UTC) |
*:Let's do it! [[User:Sickminecraft45|Sickminecraft45]] ([[User talk:Sickminecraft45|talk]]) 13:13, 5 November 2022 (UTC) |
||
* {{support}} Why not? Seems like a good idea. [[User:Blad|Blad]] ([[User talk:Blad|talk]]) 15:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC) |
* {{support}} Why not? Seems like a good idea. [[User:Blad|Blad]] ([[User talk:Blad|talk]]) 15:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC) |
||
*:Let's do it then! [[User:Sickminecraft45|Sickminecraft45]] ([[User talk:Sickminecraft45|talk]]) 19:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
===Oppose=== |
===Oppose=== |
||
| Line 21: | Line 26: | ||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
---- |
|||
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. '''Please do not modify it'''. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
|||
</div> |
|||
Latest revision as of 14:05, 8 November 2022
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Should we separate the 1953 and 1956 20th Century Fox logos? I ran a poll on the forums and all votes said yes. So should we do it?
I consider them separate logos. Sickminecraft45 (talk) 19:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
EDIT: Let's separate them! I tried but failed! So let's collab with it! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 15:13, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Support
Support I really don't understand why the 1956 logo is considered a variant when it looks very different from the 1953 logo (the "0" is straight instead of slanted, the font is different, and there are fewer details). 
· Talk · Edits 07:26, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- Let's separate them! We should start it soon. Sickminecraft45 (talk) 08:46, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support IMO they're distinct enough and I think they should be separated. Logohub (talk) 11:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Let's do it! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 13:12, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support It's barely even an enhanced variant btw. It was even enhanced for a short time.
(Visit my talk page!) 12:22, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Let's do it! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 13:12, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support per everyone ifyoudarethenpizzait aka Compooper (talk) 12:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Let's do it! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 13:13, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support Why not? Seems like a good idea. Blad (talk) 15:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Let's do it then! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 19:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
