AVID:Requests for Comment/Separate 1953 and 1956 TCF logos: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
→Support: Reply |
|||
Line 6:
* {{Support|strongest}} I really don't understand why the 1956 logo is considered a variant when it looks very different from the 1953 logo (the "0" is straight instead of slanted, the font is different, and there are fewer details). [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 07:26, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
*:Let's separate them! We should start it soon. [[User:Sickminecraft45|Sickminecraft45]] ([[User talk:Sickminecraft45|talk]]) 08:46, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
* {{Support|strongest}} IMO they're distinct enough and I think they should be separated. ''[[User:Logohub|<span style="font-size: 120%;"><span style="font-family:'serif';">Logohub</span></span>]]'' ([[User talk:Logohub|talk]]) 11:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
===Oppose===
| |||
Revision as of 11:49, 5 November 2022
Should we separate the 1953 and 1956 20th Century Fox logos? I ran a poll on the forums and all votes said yes. So should we do it?
I consider them separate logos. Sickminecraft45 (talk) 19:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Support
Support I really don't understand why the 1956 logo is considered a variant when it looks very different from the 1953 logo (the "0" is straight instead of slanted, the font is different, and there are fewer details). 
· Talk · Edits 07:26, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- Let's separate them! We should start it soon. Sickminecraft45 (talk) 08:46, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support IMO they're distinct enough and I think they should be separated. Logohub (talk) 11:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
