AVID:Requests for Comment/Separate 1953 and 1956 TCF logos: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
imported>Blad |
||
Line 14:
* {{Support}} '''per everyone''' [[User:Compooper|ifyoudarethenpizzait aka Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 12:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
*:Let's do it! [[User:Sickminecraft45|Sickminecraft45]] ([[User talk:Sickminecraft45|talk]]) 13:13, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
* {{support}} Why not? Seems like a good idea. [[User:Blad|Blad]] ([[User talk:Blad|talk]]) 15:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
===Oppose===
| |||
Revision as of 15:26, 6 November 2022
Should we separate the 1953 and 1956 20th Century Fox logos? I ran a poll on the forums and all votes said yes. So should we do it?
I consider them separate logos. Sickminecraft45 (talk) 19:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
EDIT: Let's separate them! I tried but failed! So let's collab with it! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 15:13, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Support
Support I really don't understand why the 1956 logo is considered a variant when it looks very different from the 1953 logo (the "0" is straight instead of slanted, the font is different, and there are fewer details). 
· Talk · Edits 07:26, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
- Let's separate them! We should start it soon. Sickminecraft45 (talk) 08:46, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support IMO they're distinct enough and I think they should be separated. Logohub (talk) 11:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Let's do it! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 13:12, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support It's barely even an enhanced variant btw. It was even enhanced for a short time.
(Visit my talk page!) 12:22, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Let's do it! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 13:12, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support per everyone ifyoudarethenpizzait aka Compooper (talk) 12:34, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Let's do it! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 13:13, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support Why not? Seems like a good idea. Blad (talk) 15:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
