AVID:Requests for Comment/Separate 1953 and 1956 TCF logos: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
===Support=== |
===Support=== |
||
* {{Support|strongest}} I really don't understand why the 1956 logo is considered a variant when it looks very different from the 1953 logo (the "0" is straight instead of slanted, the font is different, and there are fewer details). [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 07:26, 2 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
===Oppose=== |
===Oppose=== |
||
Revision as of 07:26, 2 November 2022
Should we separate the 1953 and 1956 20th Century Fox logos? I ran a poll on the forums and all votes said yes. So should we do it?
I consider them separate logos. Sickminecraft45 (talk) 19:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Support
Support I really don't understand why the 1956 logo is considered a variant when it looks very different from the 1953 logo (the "0" is straight instead of slanted, the font is different, and there are fewer details). 
· Talk · Edits 07:26, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
