AVID:Requests for Comment/Shift the "User Reports" page to major rule violations only: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content added Content deleted
(→Oppose: Reply) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
===Oppose=== |
===Oppose=== |
||
{{Oppose}} I don't see why we should do this, reports are meant to be for any kind of damage done to the wiki. [[User:TheNintendoGuy9009|TheNintendoGuy9009]] ([[User talk:TheNintendoGuy9009|talk]]) 19:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC) |
{{Oppose}} I don't see why we should do this, reports are meant to be for any kind of damage done to the wiki. [[User:TheNintendoGuy9009|TheNintendoGuy9009]] ([[User talk:TheNintendoGuy9009|talk]]) 19:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
:I agree! [[File:Sickminecraft45 Signature Icon.jpg|link=User:Sickminecraft45]] [[User_talk:Sickminecraft45| ('''''Talk to Me!''''')]] 19:03, 10 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
Revision as of 19:03, 10 February 2023
Shift the "User Reports" page to major rule violations only
The reports on various users for small reasons have appeared to get out of hand, especially with a lot of them being minor rule violations such as "section misuse" or "single upload related reasons". A lot of them feel like they don't deserve immediate action as opposed to vandalism/sockpuppetry.
To set the record of reporting a user on this site, I think major rule violations should only be valid in this case. Camenati (talk) 18:53, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Support
Abstain
Abstain There are genuine reasons for minor reports ao I'm abstaining. 
(Talk to Me!) 19:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose I don't see why we should do this, reports are meant to be for any kind of damage done to the wiki. TheNintendoGuy9009 (talk) 19:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- I agree! (Talk to Me!) 19:03, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
