AVID:Requests for Comment/Since MDY and DMY date formats are being used accordingly, why not use the YMD date format as well?: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
(11 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{archive top|Closing as {{rejected|failed}} per author request. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 19:24, 6 September 2023 (UTC)}} |
|||
==Since MDY and DMY date formats are being used accordingly, why not use the YMD date format as well?== |
==Since MDY and DMY date formats are being used accordingly, why not use the YMD date format as well?== |
||
Back in February, before I joined the Miraheze site, there was [[AVID:Requests for Comment/Use MDY and DMY date formats accordingly|a RfC proposal involving use of date formats according to country of origin]]. The proposal was passed of course, but one date format was not brought up in that proposal: the year-month-day format used in Japan. |
Back in February, before I joined the Miraheze site, there was [[AVID:Requests for Comment/Use MDY and DMY date formats accordingly|a RfC proposal involving use of date formats according to country of origin]]. The proposal was passed of course, but one date format was not brought up in that proposal: the year-month-day format used in Japan. |
||
Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
===Support=== |
===Support=== |
||
#{{Support}} Could do, I guess. [[User:Gilby1385|Gilby1385]] ([[User talk:Gilby1385|talk]]) 22:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Support}} Could do, I guess. [[User:Gilby1385|Gilby1385]] ([[User talk:Gilby1385|talk]]) 22:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC) |
||
#{{Support}} [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 22:58, 2 September 2023 (UTC) |
#<s>{{Support}} [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 22:58, 2 September 2023 (UTC)</s> |
||
#{{Support}} [[User:ForcedExcess26|ForcedExcess26]] ([[User talk:ForcedExcess26|talk]]) 00:21, 3 September 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Support}} [[User:ForcedExcess26|ForcedExcess26]] ([[User talk:ForcedExcess26|talk]]) 00:21, 3 September 2023 (UTC) |
||
#{{Support}} I'm confused on why this hasn't been a thing yet tbh [[User:Tabit|Tabit]] ([[User talk:Tabit|talk]]) 01:42, 3 September 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Support}} I'm confused on why this hasn't been a thing yet tbh [[User:Tabit|Tabit]] ([[User talk:Tabit|talk]]) 01:42, 3 September 2023 (UTC) |
||
#{{Support}} The ISO format is very accessibility friendly. [[User:VenusandMars77|VenusandMars77]] ([[User talk:VenusandMars77|talk]]) 20:14, 4 September 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Support}} The ISO format is very accessibility friendly. [[User:VenusandMars77|VenusandMars77]] ([[User talk:VenusandMars77|talk]]) 20:14, 4 September 2023 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
#{{Support}} Also for: |
|||
#:You can't support a proposal twice. [[User:Logoarto|Logoarto]] ([[User talk:Logoarto|talk]]) 08:54, 6 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
* China |
|||
* South Korea |
|||
* North Korea |
|||
* Taiwan |
|||
* Hungary |
|||
* Mongolia |
|||
* Lithuania |
|||
* Bhutan |
|||
⚫ | |||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
Line 30: | Line 21: | ||
#{{Oppose}} I believe it should be the other way around. Allowing any kind of date format to be used makes nn/nn/nn cases ambiguous, potentially causing trouble for editors and readers. I want to make it known that this serves as both a counterpoint to this and the already passed RfC; it makes no sense to oppose a third format without opposing a second format. [[User:Chloafifteen|Chloafifteen]] ([[User talk:Chloafifteen|talk]]) 10:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Oppose}} I believe it should be the other way around. Allowing any kind of date format to be used makes nn/nn/nn cases ambiguous, potentially causing trouble for editors and readers. I want to make it known that this serves as both a counterpoint to this and the already passed RfC; it makes no sense to oppose a third format without opposing a second format. [[User:Chloafifteen|Chloafifteen]] ([[User talk:Chloafifteen|talk]]) 10:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC) |
||
#{{Oppose}} per Chloe. [[User:Logoarto|Logoarto]] ([[User talk:Logoarto|talk]]) 09:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Oppose}} per Chloe. [[User:Logoarto|Logoarto]] ([[User talk:Logoarto|talk]]) 09:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC) |
||
#{{Oppose}} Per above. I feel like this is one of the situations where consistency is more important than appeasing every single group. [[User:Eternity Media Group|Eternity Media Group]] ([[User talk:Eternity Media Group|talk]]) 09:56, 5 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
#{{Oppose}} per everyone else in this section. [[User:Charlie179|Charlie179]] ([[User talk:Charlie179|talk]]) 10:07, 5 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
#{{Oppose}} after realizing the issues with this proposal. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 17:59, 6 September 2023 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
#Given how Chloe has successfully convinced users to go back to the "Americanization" of dates (as a current RfC suggests), I'm disappointed to say that I have to withdraw this proposal. --[[User:AUnnamedDragon|AUnnamedDragon]] 2:42 PM, September 6, 2023 (CET) |
|||
⚫ | |||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
||
__NOTOC__ |
__NOTOC__ |
||
{{Archive bottom}} |
Latest revision as of 19:24, 6 September 2023