AVID:Requests for Comment/Subpage and parentheses hybrid system: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
JrStudios (talk | contribs)
Line 38: Line 38:


===Comments===
===Comments===
{{Comment}} How am I going to continue the continent splits? [[File:JrStudiosprofile.png|150px|link=User:JrStudios]]([[User talk:JrStudios|What you gonna do when clip-ons come for you!?]]) 02:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
:{{Comment}} How am I going to continue the continent splits? [[File:JrStudiosprofile.png|150px|link=User:JrStudios]]([[User talk:JrStudios|What you gonna do when clip-ons come for you!?]]) 02:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
[[Category:Requests for Comment]]
[[Category:Requests for Comment]]
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__

Revision as of 19:27, 3 January 2024

Subpage/parentheses hybrid system

I originally brought this up on the Discord but, with more sections that we are getting + the upcoming "Availability"/"Sources" subpage, I feel like subpages can become clogged and make titles look kind of messy. Imagine "Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment/Home Video Bumpers/North America/Availability". See what I mean?

Therefore, I propose this subpage/parentheses hybrid system inspired by both MW's subpage system and Wikipedia's parentheses system. The hierarchy would be as follows

  • Walt Disney Pictures
    • Walt Disney Pictures/Sources
    • Walt Disney Pictures/Logo Variations
    • Walt Disney Pictures/Trailer Variations
  • Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment
    • Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment/Sources
  • Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment (Home Video Bumpers)
    • Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment (Home Video Bumpers)/Sources
  • Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment (Warning Screens)
    • Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment (Warning Screens)/Sources
    • Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment (Warning Screens)/Warning Screen Variations

Subpages would only be reserved to those directly linked to the main logo/ID/bumper:

  • Sources
  • Logo Variations
  • Trailer Variations
  • Any other "Variations" page

What do you all think? I'd like to hear your input on this. Logoarto (talk) 11:40, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support as proposer. Logoarto (talk) 13:49, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
  2. Support Sure, why not. | (lets play football) 15:12, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
  3. Support. Solarstrike (talk) 17:34, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
  4. Support I guess so. Gilby1385 (talk) 17:47, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
  5. Support · Talk · Edits 21:40, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
  6. Support the best way to go forward imho. EMG/J/Roxie (He/They) (Let's Chat!) 09:14, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
    Adding on that I agree with JR that it should continue to be called "Availability" so as to align with the section on the main page. EMG/J/Roxie (He/They) (Let's Chat!) 02:17, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
  7. Support Will help simplify but instead of Sources, it should be Availability as previously thought of. (What you gonna do when clip-ons come for you!?) 23:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Abstain

Oppose

Comments

 Comment: How am I going to continue the continent splits? (What you gonna do when clip-ons come for you!?) 02:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.