AVID:Requests for Comment/Upscaling images: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
Created page with "I have seen one user complain about another updating uploads that are upscaled versions of the previous ones. The question with this is whether or not to allow upscaling on the site? On one hand, they do increase the quality of small sizes but at the same time lose the small details within them. So, the format of this RfC will be different from the others, considering I am not sure whether to speak in favor or against them, but still revolves around gathering community..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
===Allow upscaling=== |
===Allow upscaling=== |
||
{{Approved|Big yes from me,}} so long as it is for active preservation rather than for the sake of upscaling. [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:MinistrycraftEntertainment]] (name change coming soon) 05:41, 25 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
===Forbid upscaling=== |
===Forbid upscaling=== |
||
Revision as of 05:41, 25 December 2022
I have seen one user complain about another updating uploads that are upscaled versions of the previous ones. The question with this is whether or not to allow upscaling on the site? On one hand, they do increase the quality of small sizes but at the same time lose the small details within them.
So, the format of this RfC will be different from the others, considering I am not sure whether to speak in favor or against them, but still revolves around gathering community consensus on a specific idea. Camenati (talk) 05:39, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Allow upscaling
Big yes from me, so long as it is for active preservation rather than for the sake of upscaling. 
(name change coming soon) 05:41, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
