AVID:Requests for Comment/let's add 13 new fonts: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
imported>MirahezeGDPR 88da7cb7afcc9101e0b4087ac452ce79 →what will the fonts be?: new section |
m added Category:Failed Requests for Comment using HotCat |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archive top|'''Speedy close''' as there is already a similar RfC regarding this issue. [[User:Compooper|Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 14:40, 5 February 2023 (UTC)}} |
|||
== what will the fonts be? == |
== what will the fonts be? == |
||
Line 29: | Line 31: | ||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
{{Comment}} This has the same purpose as [[AVID:Requests for Comment/Have Different Fonts Implemented on AVID|this RFC]], which was requested earlier today. I vote "Speedy close". [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 18:23, 3 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
{{Comment}} '''Speedy close''' per Camenati. <span style="font-family: 'Verdana';">[[User:Doctorine Dark|Doctorine Dark]] <small>([[User talk:Doctorine Dark|talk]])</small></span> 18:37, 3 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
||
[[Category:Failed Requests for Comment]] |
|||
{{Archive bottom}} |
Latest revision as of 05:14, 28 February 2023