AVID:Requests for Comment/merge the 1st and 3rd dickhouse productions logo: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
*Look, we know, the RfC for preventing these types of proposals hasn't passed yet. But still, as said before, logo separating/merging proposals like this would be better fit for discussing on a talk page. I don't get why this needs to be put on an RfC. Sorry for my bluntness but this is kinda annoying me [[User:Compooper|ifyoudarethenpizzait aka Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 23:23, 8 November 2022 (UTC) |
|||
===Oppose=== |
===Oppose=== |
Revision as of 23:24, 8 November 2022
i think the 1st and 3rd dickhouse productions logos are the same. i think we should merge those logos.
Support
Abstain
- Look, we know, the RfC for preventing these types of proposals hasn't passed yet. But still, as said before, logo separating/merging proposals like this would be better fit for discussing on a talk page. I don't get why this needs to be put on an RfC. Sorry for my bluntness but this is kinda annoying me ifyoudarethenpizzait aka Compooper (talk) 23:23, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
- Please see AVID:Requests for Comment/Define appropriate use for Requests for Comment CalvinWilkerson (talk) 23:04, 8 November 2022 (UTC)