Audiovisual Identity Database:Requests for Comment/Define "POV" in removing Legacy sections

So I see there's a bit of a conflict in what's considered "POV".

These statements include but are not limited to:

• "this logo is a favorite of many"
• "this logo is fondly remembered for those who watched (SHOW)"
• "many people like this logo due to its animation"

Some consider statements like these to be good enough, and I think it's because of the fact that they assume it's not just one person, and believe most people are in agreement.

Then, on the other side, some users are removing Legacy sections written out as such, saying that they are "POV" and "unfounded". Some users have attempted to put back those sections, but ultimately get deleted again. Because of this, there is no general consensus on what or what not to consider "POV".

So, I'm making this proposal to hopefully solve this. I'm going to include a Yes-No vote, not just a typical Support-Oppose vote. The side with the larger number of votes will be added to the tutorial guidelines and will be effective following the closing of this vote.

-Compooper 12:30, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Should Legacy include "favorite of many" statements?

Don't forget to explain your reasoning.

YES

• Big yes from me here. Most statements in this vein can be backed up by literally looking in a YouTube comments section (*cough* Starz 2016 *cough*). (name change coming soon) 13:05, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
• It's a yes from me. Logohub (talk) 13:16, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
• Yeah! This is a crucial part to the legacy section (• USER TALK! •) 13:43, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
• Yes, I fully support this. I have noticed the Legacy section to be the source of some community drama recently, so some clarity on how it is to be used would be welcome and should help kerb the drama Luke2505 (talk) 17:26, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
• Definitely. SnowflakesOmega (talk) 21:06, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
• Yes, if it is a logo that really is popular in the logo community and/or a show fanbase and not something that is clearly a single editor's opinion. For two examples for judging, does it appear on logotuber "favorite logo" compilations on YouTube a lot? Are the comments on uploads of the logo individually praising the logo even if the commentators do not appear to be part of the logo community? I've been waiting for this RFC for ages because without naming names some recent edits have been driving me nuts. I think the system used for YMMV on TV Tropes would be a good model in keeping the Legacies balanced in consensus. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 21:41, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

NO

• Absolutely not. It's a pointless filler phrase. Most logos could be considered "a favorite of many" depending on what one's definition of "many" is. It wasn't on that many pages to begin with. The legacy section is not meant for vague observations. --Shakla (talk) 19:17, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
• No. This will open the floodgates to bring back the same problems this change was designed to curb. --Bridgeleoi (talk) 21:31, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
• Per Shakla. · Talk · Edits 21:48, 27 November 2022 (UTC)