AVID:Requests for Comment/Make the availability section for commercial tags optional/only to state specific examples: Difference between revisions
Created page with "{{subst:RfC Page|Make the availability section for commercial tags optional/only to state specific examples|Reiterating what TheNintendoGuy9009 said to me: there might be a couple of famous commercials for brands out there but that doesn't mean all brands have specific commercials. Most of the time, brands will use the tag for hundreds of often unrelated commercials. Many commercials don't have names and specific details. I think the availability section should be..." |
No edit summary |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archive top|{{approved|Passed}} per consensus [[User:Logoarto|Logoarto]] ([[User talk:Logoarto|talk]]) 14:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{RFC Draft}} |
|||
==Make the availability section for commercial tags optional/only to state specific examples== |
==Make the availability section for commercial tags optional/only to state specific examples== |
||
Reiterating what TheNintendoGuy9009 said to me: there might be a couple of famous commercials for brands out there but that doesn't mean all brands have specific commercials. |
Reiterating what TheNintendoGuy9009 said to me: there might be a couple of famous commercials for brands out there but that doesn't mean all brands have specific commercials. |
||
| Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
I think the availability section should be optional and only used to state specific examples, i.e. This endtag is seen on the infamous X commercial about Y, something like that, or if the tag is a one-off. |
I think the availability section should be optional and only used to state specific examples, i.e. This endtag is seen on the infamous X commercial about Y, something like that, or if the tag is a one-off. |
||
EDIT: Open for voting! [[User:Logoarto|Logoarto]] ([[User talk:Logoarto|talk]]) 11:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
===Support=== |
===Support=== |
||
#{{Support}} [[User:Compooper|Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 12:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
#{{Support}} Though I feel like the "Availability" section can still be included if the commercial in question is on a home media release such as VHS. [[User:Gilby1385|Gilby1385]] ([[User talk:Gilby1385|talk]]) 12:47, 21 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
#{{Support}} real [[File:TVB-12-3-2023.png|50px|link=User:TVB]] | ([[User talk:TVB|lets play football]]) 13:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC) |
|||
#{{Support}} per Gilby. --[[User:AUnnamedDragon|AUnnamedDragon]] 9:33 AM, May 21, 2024 (CET) |
|||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
||
| Line 16: | Line 20: | ||
===Comments=== |
===Comments=== |
||
__NOTOC__ |
__NOTOC__ |
||
[[Category:Requests for Comment]] |
|||
{{Archive bottom}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 14:24, 28 May 2024
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Make the availability section for commercial tags optional/only to state specific examples
Reiterating what TheNintendoGuy9009 said to me: there might be a couple of famous commercials for brands out there but that doesn't mean all brands have specific commercials.
Most of the time, brands will use the tag for hundreds of often unrelated commercials. Many commercials don't have names and specific details.
I think the availability section should be optional and only used to state specific examples, i.e. This endtag is seen on the infamous X commercial about Y, something like that, or if the tag is a one-off.
EDIT: Open for voting! Logoarto (talk) 11:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Support
Support Compooper (talk) 12:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)- Support Though I feel like the "Availability" section can still be included if the commercial in question is on a home media release such as VHS. Gilby1385 (talk) 12:47, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support real
| (lets play football) 13:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC) - Support per Gilby. --AUnnamedDragon 9:33 AM, May 21, 2024 (CET)
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
