AVID:Requests for Comment/Outlaw section removal RFCs: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
Maybe I should have had a comments section |
m added Category:Closed Requests for Comment using HotCat |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa"> |
|||
⚫ | |||
:The following discussion is closed. '''Please do not modify it'''. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
|||
::Closing as '''no consensus''', with equal amounts of Support and Abstain votes. [[User:HibiscusCrown20|HibiscusCrown20]] ([[User talk:HibiscusCrown20|talk]]) 18:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
---- |
|||
This is one I have seen a lot. |
This is one I have seen a lot. |
||
There have been multiple RFCs lately that ask to remove a section in a page. |
There have been multiple RFCs lately that ask to remove a section in a page. |
||
Line 10: | Line 13: | ||
# {{Support|Strongest}} I feel like these are the worst types of RfCs out there. Overhauls are good, but '''NOT. THESE.''' [[User:JrStudios|JrStudios]] ([[User talk:JrStudios|talk]]) 13:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC) |
# {{Support|Strongest}} I feel like these are the worst types of RfCs out there. Overhauls are good, but '''NOT. THESE.''' [[User:JrStudios|JrStudios]] ([[User talk:JrStudios|talk]]) 13:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC) |
||
# {{Support|Strongest}} At this rate, we'll just remove the entire wiki [[File:CalvinWilkerson-transformed.png|300px|link=User:CalvinWilkerson]]([[User talk:CalvinWilkerson|The Third Place]]) 13:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC) |
# {{Support|Strongest}} At this rate, we'll just remove the entire wiki [[File:CalvinWilkerson-transformed.png|300px|link=User:CalvinWilkerson]]([[User talk:CalvinWilkerson|The Third Place]]) 13:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC) |
||
#:based [[User:Setrki Desu|<span style= "color:#f55197">[[User:Setrki Desu|'''SETRKI''']] *</span> <span style="color:#002f87">[[User_Talk:Setrki Desu|''talk_pag''e]] ~</span> ]] ([[User talk:Setrki Desu|talk]]) 22:48, 1 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
# {{Support|Strongest}} '''''in the world''''' <span style="font-family:'AVID Sans';">Compooper</span> 13:54, 29 November 2022 (UTC) |
# {{Support|Strongest}} '''''in the world''''' <span style="font-family:'AVID Sans';">Compooper</span> 13:54, 29 November 2022 (UTC) |
||
# {{Support|Strongest}} <small><span style="background-color: #FC0; border: 4px ridge #333; -webkit-border-radius: 12px; -moz-border-radius: 12px; border-radius: 8px; padding: 4px;">[[User:DmitriLeon2000|<span style="color:black;">'''DmitriLeon2000'''</span>]] <span style=" background-color: #333; border: 2px outset #333; -webkit-border-radius: 8px; -moz-border-radius: 8px; border-radius: 8px; padding: 0px 4px 0px 4px;">[[User talk:DmitriLeon2000|<span style="color:white;">'''TALK'''</span>]]</span> <span style="background-color: #06C; border: 2px outset #36C; -webkit-border-radius: 8px; -moz-border-radius: 8px; border-radius: 8px; padding: 0px 4px 0px 4px;">[[Special:Contributions/DmitriLeon2000|<span style="color: white;">'''CONTRIB'''</span>]]</span> <span style="background-color: #033; border: 2px inset #CCC; -webkit-border-radius: 4px; -moz-border-radius: 4px; border-radius: 4px; color:#0CC">''02:03, 2 December, 2022 (UTC) ''</span></span></small> |
|||
==Abstain== |
==Abstain== |
||
Line 19: | Line 24: | ||
==Oppose== |
==Oppose== |
||
#{{oppose|strong}} That is the entire point of an RfC, quote [[AVID:RfC]] here, "RFCs should be opened about matters concerning the wiki as a whole, such as policy changes, enabling and disabling extensions, and features and ideas which would have significant effect on the wiki as a whole.". If a section is flawed, why keep it? Sure, they can be annoying, but if it's silly, it obviously won't pass. --''[[User:Blad|<span style="font-weight: bold; background:linear-gradient(#ff00ff,#c800c8,purple,#c800c8,#ff00ff);; -webkit-background-clip:text !important; -webkit-text-fill-color:transparent">Blad</span>]]'' ([[User_talk:Blad|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Blad|contribs]] • [[mh:meta:Special:CentralAuth/Blad|global]]) 17:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC) |
#{{oppose|strong}} That is the entire point of an RfC, quote [[AVID:RfC]] here, "RFCs should be opened about matters concerning the wiki as a whole, such as policy changes, enabling and disabling extensions, and features and ideas which would have significant effect on the wiki as a whole.". If a section is flawed, why keep it? Sure, they can be annoying, but if it's silly, it obviously won't pass. --''[[User:Blad|<span style="font-weight: bold; background:linear-gradient(#ff00ff,#c800c8,purple,#c800c8,#ff00ff);; -webkit-background-clip:text !important; -webkit-text-fill-color:transparent">Blad</span>]]'' ([[User_talk:Blad|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Blad|contribs]] • [[mh:meta:Special:CentralAuth/Blad|global]]) 17:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC) |
||
#{{oppose|strong}} Per Blad. --[[User:RSX-798|RSX-798]] ([[User talk:RSX-798|talk]]) 00:28, 1 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
==Comments== |
==Comments== |
||
---- |
|||
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. '''Please do not modify it'''. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. |
|||
</div> |
|||
⚫ | |||
[[Category:Closed Requests for Comment]] |