Forum:Implementation of Draft system: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
Created page with "{{Forumheader|General Discussion}} {{Forumpost |text=With the surge of socks by users like Chuck, PBSArchive and Noah, and also to combat the huge number of stubs/empty pages created on this wiki, I think we should implement a Draft system similar to MediaWiki, or perhaps a system similar to the Writer system in WF. That means, newly-registered users would not be able to create pages in the main namespace until they reach a certain edit count, but they could do so in the..." |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|General Discussion}} |
{{Forumheader|General Discussion}} |
||
⚫ | |||
{{Forumpost |
{{Forumpost |
||
|text=With the surge of socks by users like Chuck, PBSArchive and Noah, and also to combat the huge number of stubs/empty pages created on this wiki, I think we should implement a Draft system similar to |
|text=With the surge of socks by users like Chuck, PBSArchive and Noah, and also to combat the huge number of stubs/empty pages created on this wiki, I think we should implement a Draft system similar to Wikipedia, or perhaps a system similar to the Writer system in WF. That means, newly-registered users would not be able to create pages in the main namespace until they reach a certain edit count, but they could do so in the draft namespace which could act as some sort of a "community sandbox". This is what [[User:Hb1290]] said in another thread: |
||
{{quote|Also I wouldn't be opposed to adding a draft space. It would be a useful place for new editors to figure things out and a good place to put things that aren't mainspace quality but aren't vandalism, trolling or crappy enough to warrant deleting them altogether. It would be an extra step of quality control that we probably need since we're getting more encyclopedic and moving beyond "Scaaaaaary logoz" and "cheesy factors". As for how it would work, we should at least create some guidelines, like: |
{{quote|Also I wouldn't be opposed to adding a draft space. It would be a useful place for new editors to figure things out and a good place to put things that aren't mainspace quality but aren't vandalism, trolling or crappy enough to warrant deleting them altogether. It would be an extra step of quality control that we probably need since we're getting more encyclopedic and moving beyond "Scaaaaaary logoz" and "cheesy factors". As for how it would work, we should at least create some guidelines, like: |
||
Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
|timestamp=16 June 2022 |
|timestamp=16 June 2022 |
||
}} |
}} |
||
⚫ |
Revision as of 07:18, 16 June 2022
Report post
|
With the surge of socks by users like Chuck, PBSArchive and Noah, and also to combat the huge number of stubs/empty pages created on this wiki, I think we should implement a Draft system similar to Wikipedia, or perhaps a system similar to the Writer system in WF. That means, newly-registered users would not be able to create pages in the main namespace until they reach a certain edit count, but they could do so in the draft namespace which could act as some sort of a "community sandbox". This is what User:Hb1290 said in another thread: Also I wouldn't be opposed to adding a draft space. It would be a useful place for new editors to figure things out and a good place to put things that aren't mainspace quality but aren't vandalism, trolling or crappy enough to warrant deleting them altogether. It would be an extra step of quality control that we probably need since we're getting more encyclopedic and moving beyond "Scaaaaaary logoz" and "cheesy factors". As for how it would work, we should at least create some guidelines, like: |