Forum:More of the TAT logo: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
imported>Jmfabianorpl
No edit summary
Line 47: Line 47:
|text=Screams "fake" to me. Note the fake filter being applied over the real one, plus the changing aspect ratio.
|text=Screams "fake" to me. Note the fake filter being applied over the real one, plus the changing aspect ratio.
|username=Trevor807
|username=Trevor807
|rank=
|timestamp=7 May 2023
|timestamp=7 May 2023
}}
{{Forumpost
|text=Yep, it's a fake too. Word of advice: check the title and descriptions. Most of these actually give away the fact that these are remakes. (usually "PLEASE READ THE VIDEO/CHANNEL DESCRIPTION" disclaimers put at the end)

I think these videos should be required to have "Remake" or "Recreation" prominent in the video's title. ESPECIALLY TAT ones. This is tied for my first biggest pet peeve about that logo. The other one being people saying they have TAT and some other logo, when they are really referencing the in-credit notice on many shows.
|username=Jmfabianorpl
|rank=
|timestamp=11 May 2023
}}
}}

Revision as of 15:59, 11 May 2023


avatar
IlCattivo25
User
6 March 2022

Reply or edit
Report post



How did we miss this for nearly two years?


Reply or edit
Report post



Based on the comments, this seems to be a reconstruction


avatar
IlCattivo25
User
6 March 2022

Reply or edit
Report post



Damn! Sure fooled me. It certainly didn't look like it could be faked. Reconstructors these days are becoming more and more sophisticated...


avatar
Pumpkinman99
User
22 March 2022

Reply or edit
Report post



Most reconstructions are missing a key element that is usually missed on the real logo we have a partial recording of. The “C” in Communications is larger than the rest of the word and looks slightly different than the rest of the letters, you can see this in the last few frames when it fades into the CBS logo.

This may be the case with “Company” as well but until we find another legitimate recording it’s hard to tell since the star obstructs that part of the word.


avatar
James Fabiano
User
6 December 2022

Reply or edit
Report post



Which is why we need to go a step further if someone claims to have the actual thing. We need some extra verification steps when that time comes.


avatar
James Fabiano
User
6 December 2022

Reply or edit
Report post



{{{text}}}


Reply or edit
Report post



I found an 80’s Columbia plaster which retains most of the theme: https://youtu.be/HUy3Yr4XZuw


avatar
Trevor807
User
7 May 2023

Reply or edit
Report post



Screams "fake" to me. Note the fake filter being applied over the real one, plus the changing aspect ratio.


avatar
Jmfabianorpl
User
11 May 2023

Reply or edit
Report post



Yep, it's a fake too. Word of advice: check the title and descriptions. Most of these actually give away the fact that these are remakes. (usually "PLEASE READ THE VIDEO/CHANNEL DESCRIPTION" disclaimers put at the end)

I think these videos should be required to have "Remake" or "Recreation" prominent in the video's title. ESPECIALLY TAT ones. This is tied for my first biggest pet peeve about that logo. The other one being people saying they have TAT and some other logo, when they are really referencing the in-credit notice on many shows.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.