Forum:Print logo wiki?: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
Besides, the CBD will be merged back to AVID soon. |
Besides, the CBD will be merged back to AVID soon. |
||
|username=Nico234 |
|username=Nico234 |
||
|rank=User |
|||
|timestamp=11 October 2022 |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Forumpost |
|||
|text=Well ok, It's just an idea. |
|||
|username=Sickminecraft45 |
|||
|rank=User |
|rank=User |
||
|timestamp=11 October 2022 |
|timestamp=11 October 2022 |
Revision as of 16:42, 11 October 2022
Report post
|
(Should I create a new dedicated print logo wiki on Miraheze?) You must have a wiki account to vote You must have a wiki account to view poll results There were 0 votes since the poll was created on 12:28, 11 July 2023. poll-id 53DA659E2D020995A67477552D29F974 |
Report post
|
If this poll is a victory, I will have a poll on what it should be called, When a name is chosen, I will create the wiki and when it's accepted, we will have a poll on who should be the bureaucrats and admins, what it will look like, and a logo. |
Report post
|
no |
Report post
|
there are many print logos in logopedia, so you shouldn't, because print logos aren't audiovisual identity. |
Report post
|
I think that a dedicated print logo wiki will be a good idea just like there is a dedicated company bumper wiki. Logopedia isn't just print logos, it also has company logos like McDonald's, KFC, Apple etc. |
Report post
|
Still, it's unnecessary and redundant. Besides, the CBD will be merged back to AVID soon. |
Report post
|
Well ok, It's just an idea. |