Forum:Proposal: use Infoboxes to supplement longer background sections: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Content deleted Content added
imported>SubparMario63
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 31: Line 31:
|username=SubparMario63
|username=SubparMario63
|rank=User
|rank=User
|timestamp=9 April 2021
}}
{{Forumpost
|text={{quote|I don't think we need the image there because we already have image captures|CnowEnt}}
For that matter, I'd probably get rid of the top header too since the title kinda makes it redundant.

{{quote|I feel though that instead of listing subsidiaries, It'd just be easier to name the current parent company and link to its category page|SubparMario63}}

You make a good point. A more comprehensive list and better navigation around the wiki.
|username=Hb1290
|rank=Administrator
|timestamp=9 April 2021
|timestamp=9 April 2021
}}
}}

Revision as of 02:38, 9 April 2021

This thread has been featured.


Reply or edit
Report post



There's a tendency on our larger pages for the Background section to become a wall of text, for example Viacom_(pre-2006). I think we could supplement these sections with an infobox to provide readers with the key facts at a glance. Below is a screenshot of how this would look on the aforementioned page. I've used PortableInfobox as it suits the look of the wiki more than the Wikipedia equivalent and template construction is simpler

The template is at Template:Infobox company. At the moment it's got the essentials, but of course more parameters could be added as needed.

What do you think?


avatar
Dreamcast99
User
9 April 2021

Reply or edit
Report post



I like this idea.


avatar
CnowEnt
User
9 April 2021

Reply or edit
Report post



I don't think we need the image there because we already have image captures

But other than that, I think it's a good idea


avatar
SubparMario63
User
9 April 2021

Reply or edit
Report post



I think this'd make pages a lot easier to digest, I'm for it. I feel though that instead of listing subsidiaries, It'd just be easier to name the current parent company and link to its category page (like for this example, ViacomCBS/CBS)


Reply or edit
Report post



I don't think we need the image there because we already have image captures
— User:CnowEnt

For that matter, I'd probably get rid of the top header too since the title kinda makes it redundant.

I feel though that instead of listing subsidiaries, It'd just be easier to name the current parent company and link to its category page
— User:SubparMario63

You make a good point. A more comprehensive list and better navigation around the wiki.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.