Forum:Should the NSFW template have a reasoning parameter?: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
imported>TVB No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
|rank=User |
|rank=User |
||
|timestamp=15 July 2022 |
|timestamp=15 July 2022 |
||
}} |
|||
{{Forumpost |
|||
|text={{quote|I absolutely back this idea. A change like this would definitely help clear up some of the more vague placements of the template like the ones you listed. |
|||
'''EDIT:''' I made a potential concept for this new version of the NSFW template! Any advice or constructive criticism is welcome. |
|||
[[File:Newnsfwtemplateconcept.png|center]]}} |
|||
Looks really neat! However, I think this should also include the descriptions since logos containing erotic content will still be described despite them being disallowed on the site. |
|||
|username=Camenati |
|||
|rank=User |
|||
|timestamp=15 July 2022 |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Forumpost |
|||
|text=I've gone ahead and implemented the new parameter per HibiscusCrown's concept. The markup is <code><nowiki>{{NSFW|reason=''your reason here''}}</nowiki></code> |
|||
|username=Hb1290 |
|||
|rank=Administrator |
|||
|timestamp=16 July 2022 |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Forumpost |
|||
|text=Yeah this is absolutely needed. |
|||
|username=CooleyBoy10 |
|||
|rank=Administrator |
|||
|timestamp=31 July 2022 |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Forumpost |
|||
|text=Epic moment for common sense arrives. Thanks for that description Camenati. |
|||
|username=TVB |
|||
|rank=User |
|||
|timestamp=4 August 2022 |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
Latest revision as of 15:53, 4 August 2022
| Report post
|
By "reasoning parameter", I mean specific material the template is warning the reader about such as violence, nudity, profanity, etc. Some articles (i.e. Fat Dog Productions, Malibu Video,) have this template and their logos are seemingly not that obscene or not at all whatsoever, confusing the reader on what makes them offensive. I think this template deserves this parameter so that readers can be warned about particular subject matter, like how there's a notice for the loudness of a logo. For one logo, they might be expecting nudity but instead got profanity; they may be more offended by the latter than the former. |
| Report post
|
I've never thought about it, but that's actually a very good idea! The warnings could indeed benefit from a bit of context to help the reader know why they are advised to read the page with discretion. |
| Report post
|
Per DisneyInternationalFan. |
| Report post
|
I like it. |
| Report post
|
I absolutely back this idea. A change like this would definitely help clear up some of the more vague placements of the template like the ones you listed. EDIT: I made a potential concept for this new version of the NSFW template! Any advice or constructive criticism is welcome.  |
| Report post
|
I absolutely back this idea. A change like this would definitely help clear up some of the more vague placements of the template like the ones you listed. Looks really neat! However, I think this should also include the descriptions since logos containing erotic content will still be described despite them being disallowed on the site. |
| Report post
|
I've gone ahead and implemented the new parameter per HibiscusCrown's concept. The markup is |
| Report post
|
Yeah this is absolutely needed. |
| Report post
|
Epic moment for common sense arrives. Thanks for that description Camenati. |
