Forum:Should the NSFW template have a reasoning parameter?: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|text=I've never thought about it, but that's actually a very good idea! The warnings could indeed benefit from a bit of context to help the reader know why they are advised to read the page with discretion. |
|text=I've never thought about it, but that's actually a very good idea! The warnings could indeed benefit from a bit of context to help the reader know why they are advised to read the page with discretion. |
||
|username=DisneyInternationalFan |
|username=DisneyInternationalFan |
||
|rank=User |
|||
|timestamp=15 July 2022 |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Forumpost |
|||
|text=Per DisneyInternationalFan. |
|||
|username=Cassie Grandstaff |
|||
|rank=User |
|rank=User |
||
|timestamp=15 July 2022 |
|timestamp=15 July 2022 |
||
Revision as of 06:18, 15 July 2022
| Report post
|
By "reasoning parameter", I mean specific material the template is warning the reader about such as violence, nudity, profanity, etc. Some articles (i.e. Fat Dog Productions, Malibu Video,) have this template and their logos are seemingly not that obscene or not at all whatsoever, confusing the reader on what makes them offensive. I think this template deserves this parameter so that readers can be warned about particular subject matter, like how there's a notice for the loudness of a logo. For one logo, they might be expecting nudity but instead got profanity; they may be more offended by the latter than the former. |
| Report post
|
I've never thought about it, but that's actually a very good idea! The warnings could indeed benefit from a bit of context to help the reader know why they are advised to read the page with discretion. |
| Report post
|
Per DisneyInternationalFan. |
