Forum:Should the NSFW template have a reasoning parameter?: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Content deleted Content added
N-Lite (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
imported>AnimeTVLogos
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
|username=Cassie Grandstaff
|username=Cassie Grandstaff
|rank=User
|rank=User
|timestamp=15 July 2022
}}
{{Forumpost
|text=I like it.
|username=AnimeTVLogos
|rank=Administrator
|timestamp=15 July 2022
|timestamp=15 July 2022
}}
}}

Revision as of 20:11, 15 July 2022


avatar
Camenati
User
15 July 2022

Reply or edit
Report post



By "reasoning parameter", I mean specific material the template is warning the reader about such as violence, nudity, profanity, etc. Some articles (i.e. Fat Dog Productions, Malibu Video,) have this template and their logos are seemingly not that obscene or not at all whatsoever, confusing the reader on what makes them offensive. I think this template deserves this parameter so that readers can be warned about particular subject matter, like how there's a notice for the loudness of a logo. For one logo, they might be expecting nudity but instead got profanity; they may be more offended by the latter than the former.


Reply or edit
Report post



I've never thought about it, but that's actually a very good idea! The warnings could indeed benefit from a bit of context to help the reader know why they are advised to read the page with discretion.


Reply or edit
Report post



Per DisneyInternationalFan.


Reply or edit
Report post



I like it.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.