Forum:Should the NSFW template have a reasoning parameter?

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Revision as of 02:49, 15 July 2022 by Camenati (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Forumheader|General Discussion}} {{Forumpost |text=By "reasoning parameter", I mean specific material the template is warning the reader about such as violence, nudity, profanity, etc. Some articles (i.e. Fat Dog Productions, Malibu Video,) have this template and their logos are seemingly not that obscene or not at all whatsoever, confusing the reader on what makes them offensive. I think this template deserves this parameter so that readers c...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


avatar
Camenati
User
15 July 2022

Reply or edit
Report post



By "reasoning parameter", I mean specific material the template is warning the reader about such as violence, nudity, profanity, etc. Some articles (i.e. Fat Dog Productions, Malibu Video,) have this template and their logos are seemingly not that obscene or not at all whatsoever, confusing the reader on what makes them offensive. I think this template deserves this parameter so that readers can be warned about particular subject matter, like how there's a notice for the loudness of a logo. For one logo, they might be expecting nudity but instead got profanity; they may be more offended by the latter than the former.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.