Forum:So...: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|text=OOC how are RFCs being misused? And Dante wasn't blocked for having a sockpuppet-esque name. |
|text=OOC how are RFCs being misused? And Dante wasn't blocked for having a sockpuppet-esque name. |
||
|username=Trevor807 |
|username=Trevor807 |
||
|rank=User |
|||
|timestamp=23 January 2023 |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Forumpost |
|||
|text=It's still unnecessary to ban him till 18. As I said, I think 5 months is enough. |
|||
|username=Sonicfan19198282 |
|||
|rank=User |
|rank=User |
||
|timestamp=23 January 2023 |
|timestamp=23 January 2023 |
||
Revision as of 17:53, 23 January 2023
| Report post
|
So after seeing what happened I'm permanently leaving this wiki. There are some more reasonsː 1. The Wrong use of The RFCs 2. "Block him until he's 18" Yeah HibiscusCrown20 How do you think that's a big help? 3. Blocking someone Because their first name is similar to a sockpuppets. I really miss when this was clg wiki But Blocking someone Until they're 18? The Fact that they did that isn't Fair at all Because apparently No one knows what freedom of speech is. Good bye forever. |
| Report post
|
The downfall of DanteWilliams really is having an aftermath on the wiki. Anyways, bye. |
| Report post
|
OOC how are RFCs being misused? And Dante wasn't blocked for having a sockpuppet-esque name. |
| Report post
|
It's still unnecessary to ban him till 18. As I said, I think 5 months is enough. |
