Forum:So...: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Content added Content deleted
imported>IAmThe789Guy
No edit summary
imported>Poocian
No edit summary
Line 55: Line 55:
}}
}}
{{Forumpost
{{Forumpost
|text=Still No reason. Whatever the heck you guys are trying to tell me, It's still unfair, unnecessary and unneeded. It's a stupid way to deal with stuff and I'm never coming back to the wiki no matter what you say.
|text={{quote|and padding out their edit count to try to get a shot at an admin role by repeatedly and constantly participating in user report conversations to try to boost their numbers past the 1000 edit mark.}}
|username=Poocian

So THAT's why Charlie kept butting in to user reports he wasn't a part of to begin with??? Just so he can be on our good sides?
|username=IAmThe789Guy
|rank=User
|rank=User
|timestamp=23 January 2023
|timestamp=23 January 2023

Revision as of 18:30, 23 January 2023


avatar
Poocian
User
23 January 2023

Reply or edit
Report post



So after seeing what happened I'm permanently leaving this wiki. There are some more reasonsː

1. The Wrong use of The RFCs

2. "Block him until he's 18" Yeah HibiscusCrown20 How do you think that's a big help?

3. Blocking someone Because their first name is similar to a sockpuppets.

I really miss when this was clg wiki But Blocking someone Until they're 18? The Fact that they did that isn't Fair at all Because apparently No one knows what freedom of speech is. Good bye forever.


avatar
Sonicfan19198282
User
23 January 2023

Reply or edit
Report post



The downfall of DanteWilliams really is having an aftermath on the wiki. Anyways, bye.


avatar
Trevor807
User
23 January 2023

Reply or edit
Report post



OOC how are RFCs being misused? And Dante wasn't blocked for having a sockpuppet-esque name.


avatar
Sonicfan19198282
User
23 January 2023

Reply or edit
Report post



It's still unnecessary to ban him till 18. As I said, I think 5 months is enough.


avatar
IAmThe789Guy
User
23 January 2023

Reply or edit
Report post



OOC how are RFCs being misused?

Two users decided to make a joke RFC in which AVID is renamed to the Muppet Wiki, based on a joke Logohub told on the Discord server.


avatar
Solarstrike
User
23 January 2023

Reply or edit
Report post



(restoring from an accidental deletion)

Dante/Charlie had already gotten themselves into trouble MANY times before, so they were already on very thin ice to begin with - we never forgot the numerous incidents they did with the logo incident, their attitudes towards users like Shadowninja, and padding out their edit count to try to get a shot at an admin role by repeatedly and constantly participating in user report conversations to try to boost their numbers past the 1000 edit mark. We knew exactly what they were doing, and I bet Dante/Charlie knew that we knew too - it takes much more than just edit count alone to become an admin of this wiki. And let's not forget the various other attitude problems they had with other members that were minor by comparison.

As for why we blocked them until they were 18 - we wanted to give them the opportunity to think about and reflect on what had transpired with them, and give them ample amounts of time to think - considering they are still very young, all things considered. Lots can change in those nearly five years, from psychology to attitude towards others; among many other factors of a person. When their block time is finished and if they come back in November 2027 with a fresh mindset and a happy-go-lucky attitude, we'd gladly welcome them back with open arms!

As I said in their user talk page: "Make use of those years wisely."


avatar
Poocian
User
23 January 2023

Reply or edit
Report post



Still No reason. Whatever the heck you guys are trying to tell me, It's still unfair, unnecessary and unneeded. It's a stupid way to deal with stuff and I'm never coming back to the wiki no matter what you say.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.