Forum:Why are you guys viewing the Technique of completely still logos as "misuse"?: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
ArmanPikachu (talk | contribs) Tag: Undo |
Reverted edits made by ArmanPikachu (talk) Tag: Undo |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3:
{{Forumcat|Administrators' Board}}
{{Forumpost
|text=On pages for completely still logos, particularly vanity cards, the proper technique description for these pages ("none") is being seen as "possible misuse", and therefore a violation of rules. I have pages made whose drafts I can't submit because of this. What's going on here?
|username=Sanicspeed3
|timestamp=23 January 2024
}}
{{Forumpost
|text=That is part of a new rule on usage of the "Technique" section per [[AVID:Requests for Comment/Redefine usage of Technique on still logos|a passed RfC]].
|username=AUnnamedDragon
|rank=
|timestamp=23 January 2024
}}
{{Forumpost
|text=I would do this:
In-Credit mentions of a company are NOT logos if it's just text that's part of the credits, same font and all.
If there is an artistic design in-credit, it IS an in-credit logo.
Still logos are logos as long as they have some artistic merit to them.
|username=JMFabiano
|rank=
|timestamp=23 January 2024
}}
|
Latest revision as of 16:01, 4 February 2024
Report post
|
On pages for completely still logos, particularly vanity cards, the proper technique description for these pages ("none") is being seen as "possible misuse", and therefore a violation of rules. I have pages made whose drafts I can't submit because of this. What's going on here? |
Report post
|
That is part of a new rule on usage of the "Technique" section per a passed RfC. |
Report post
|
I would do this: In-Credit mentions of a company are NOT logos if it's just text that's part of the credits, same font and all. If there is an artistic design in-credit, it IS an in-credit logo. Still logos are logos as long as they have some artistic merit to them. |