Talk:GBH Productions: Difference between revisions
imported>LogoFun13-YT →Page Problems: new section |
m Logohub moved page Talk:GBH to Talk:GBH Productions: title change to distinguish it from the ID page. |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Page Problems == |
== Page Problems == |
||
Looks like we have some broken file links on this page. Can someone fix this issue. |
Looks like we have some broken file links on this page. Can someone fix this issue. A [[User:LogoFun13-YT|LogoFun13-YT]] Post / ([[User_talk:LogoFun13-YT|talk]]) / 17:02, 7 April 2021 (UTC) |
||
:Issues fixed. [[User:PM pinter|PM pinter]] ([[User talk:PM pinter|talk]]) 19:44, 7 April 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 09:30, 18 October 2021
My Thoughts on the New Logo
I know that the company wants to do a rebrand, but the WGBH name is very recognizable.
The logo itself looks like a placeholder, as the animation is simpler compared to the logos under the WGBH name.
This is definitely a similar case with Warner Bros. Pictures, where for WB, it is an imitation if their previous logo, only with the new shield. The only other differences to the previous WP logo were the cloud background fading out and the shield shining, that's it.
I hope GBH will get an official logo where it would look similar to the 6th WGBH logo like what that company did in the past with it's previous name.
BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 23:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Honestly, it looks like a SNL parody of WGBH or something along those lines. LARDLOGO (talk) 20:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Page Problems
Looks like we have some broken file links on this page. Can someone fix this issue. A LogoFun13-YT Post / (talk) / 17:02, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Issues fixed. PM pinter (talk) 19:44, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
