Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions
Line 623: | Line 623: | ||
# {{Support}} I like that design and colors tho. [[User:Cattotlebofficial]] ([[User talk:Cattotlebofficial|talk]] 15:40, 29 September 2022 (UTC) |
# {{Support}} I like that design and colors tho. [[User:Cattotlebofficial]] ([[User talk:Cattotlebofficial|talk]] 15:40, 29 September 2022 (UTC) |
||
# {{Support|Strongest}} Very good. This isn't all "in-your-face" unlike most other logos I've seen, it gets the point across very well. Very, VERY brilliant work. [[User:TheAmigo67|TheAmigo67]] ([[User talk:TheAmigo67|talk]]) 04:53, 30 September 2022 (UTC) |
# {{Support|Strongest}} Very good. This isn't all "in-your-face" unlike most other logos I've seen, it gets the point across very well. Very, VERY brilliant work. [[User:TheAmigo67|TheAmigo67]] ([[User talk:TheAmigo67|talk]]) 04:53, 30 September 2022 (UTC) |
||
# {{Support}}, but without the four-colour gradient as the default. Two colours or less may be better. --[[User:Pingu|Pingu]] ([[User talk:Pingu|talk]]) 17:47, 30 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
====Abstain==== |
====Abstain==== |
Revision as of 17:47, 30 September 2022
Television Update
Did Aaron's Way used the Bonnie Raskin Ice Cream logo from what I can see it didn't let me know https://youtu.be/OpytF-UYbp8
The CLG Wiki Remembers Update
Have you ever seen on and radio host Larry King dies at the age of 87. Best-known baseball player Hank Aaron, also dies at the age of 86.
Celebrity Deaths
Dustin Diamond who played on Saved by the Bell as "Screech" has died of cancer at age 44
Rapper PnB Rock passed away on September 12, 2022. The rapper was fatally shot at Roscoe's Chicken 'N Waffles in Los Angeles at 1:15 p.m. that Monday during a robbery. He was only 30 years old.
Rest in peace and may you be in our thoughts. -(_Strxwberriesrweird:)
5th Buena Vista Television Logo Update
The 5th Buena Vista Television has listed its debut as September 13, 1997 but I have an airing of Mary Poppins from May 17, 1997 that uses the 5th logo so did it debut earlier? https://youtu.be/HBB4q-TTRns
RIP Christopher Plummer (1929-2021)
The Canadian actor Christopher Plummer has died at the age of 91
Computers and internet logo wiki
I would to see a CLG style wiki on PC and Internet logos? Maybe there could be a spinoff wiki like that someday soon?
Visit my fan page Consumer Electronics Wiki
I made a fan based website called Consumer Electronics Wiki! If anyone from the CLG Wiki community would like to use it and expand it feel free to do so! Here's the link: https://cewiki.miraheze.org/w/index.php?title=Main_Page&mobileaction=toggle_view_desktop
The Animator just passed away
RIP Olivier Jean-Marie (1960 - 2021). Put it on the Remembers.
what exactly is (or was) the worldwide brotherhood corporation?
on the main page there is a disclaimer saying: "The Closing Logo Group, CLG, and other related indicia are properties of Worldwide Brotherhood Corporation"
it has been there ever since i joined back in the wf days and seems to have survived the clg's "grow up and stop acting autistic" campaign. dunno if it was an actual registered company or a pretend one the founder made up, and searching for it on google just leads to this site or something related to this site Etruongs7 (talk) 20:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- It's fictional. See Logohub's comment below. (Visit my talk page!) 08:07, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- And don't use "autistic" as an insult. As an autistic person myself, I find it highly offensive. Buzzfan120 (talk) 19:19, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Longest lived logos that are still used today
I would like to have a list of logos that have been used for a long time but that are still used to this day! Make a list! Neelyryan95 (talk) 00:17, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
I just made a page called "Longest lived logos that are still used today" just now in my user page. Click it here if you want to. Prodigy012 (talk) 18:51, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Walking Entropy article needed
By all means, I searched “Walking” & all I have is no result for walking entropy. Can you help make a page for me?
Question
Hello, I posted this earlier but I don't think I did it in the right place; are logos used at the end of commercials allowed here? There are several companies in my home country that don't use different logos for their ads (unless they're variants), and I consider them notable. I won't be making the page until I get a response though. Thanks. TheNintendoGuy9009 (talk) 15:54, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry for the late response, but commercial logos do not fall under this wiki's scope. We did have a commercial logos wiki back in WikiFoundry, but that was closed by our former management. Logohub (talk) 11:11, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ah okay, much appreciated. TheNintendoGuy9009 (talk) 14:27, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Request for comment: Future of the BoD
Final Words
I will say one more thing before I go. I really did want to work with you all. We really did appreciate all the contributions you founded, we really did. And we could have worked together really well, I thought. But I guess it's not meant to be. I just hope all of you will grow up one day and understand how the real world works. But keep drowning in all your so-called, triggers, your stupid pronouns, the weird-ass gender stuff, the self-righteousness we've been dealing with since 2015. all that. You're all weak. All of you. And if you want to play dirty, then fine, play your stupid games. But just remember, you poke at the bull too much, you will get reamed, you'll see one day. You'll see. Enjoy your Wiki. Good-bye forever. --MatthewLMayfield (talk) 05:07, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Trans rights are human rights. :) HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 05:11, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Bye! (Visit my talk page!) 09:12, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Well, you're gone now, so my words mean nothing. But I will ask WHY somebody's gender identity matters to you so much, especially on a wiki about documenting logos.
- Good luck on the "new" CLG. CooleyBoy10 (talk) 13:25, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Matthew's comment seems like a child throwing a fit. Just saying. CLGW1K1R8CKS (talk) 16:26, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- OK, boomer!
- Hey MatthewLMayfield Try us. Even if you asked, HB1290 wouldn't accept you as an admin, I wouldn't ether. You will be seen as a wannabe, a fraud, a idiot, a power abuser & a nobody. You are the one who's weak. You are not a god, You are someone who thinks he's better than everyone. Your "new" CLG Wiki will be seen as a Copy, a Fake & a rip off. Everyone has rights. Everyone on This wiki, Company Bumpers & Dream Logos will see you as someone who was never needed. See you Never. Poocian (talk) 02:03, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- He's baack! (Visit my talk page!) 02:13, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
It's still happening...
CuriousGeorge60 blocked HibiscusCrown20 and HB1290 indefinitely and unblocked Matthew L Mayfield, against Miraheze stewards.
If pointing this out is how I go out, then so long partners... AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 21:43, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Jeez... (Visit my talk page!) 23:58, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Don't worry, Agent Isai has undone me and Hb's blocks and has also made it so that the BoD won't be able to promote, demote or block anyone anymore until this discussion comes to a close! HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 00:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oh my...
- At least it's undone. TVB (talk) 00:09, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Moving forward part 1: - New leadership
I started a thread
i have started a thread discussing the future of this wiki: Forum:Preparing for a new CLG Wiki Max1111111 (talk) 04:53, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Please contribute to this thread! There's some really good ideas on it to improve the wiki. XanderG (talk) 23:09, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
The drama is nothing but pathetic.
Seriously, this is meant to be a logo wiki and all I hear is drama going on with the admins. This whole drama feels like something you would see the Miraheze reception wikis/Qualitipedia do. Oh well, it's the internet so there we go, moving on back to editing and creating pages like I normally do. I'm not angry or anything, just unhappy with it all. Luigitehplumber (talk) 17:42, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Moving forward part 1 (Take 2): Deciding our new leadership structure
Simplification of user groups
I think the abolition of the Board of Directors is a good opportunity to simplify the confusing user group structure to just six groups:
- Administrators
- Moderators
- Confirmed users
- Bots
- Users
- (all)
What are your thoughts on this? --Pingu (talk) 07:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
No need for confirmed users. User:Timpbskid23 8:24, 18 September 2022 (UTC), 11:24, 18 September 2022 (EEST, my timezone)
Request for Comments: Rebranding the wiki
}}
Branding AVID
Now for the next discussion. We have a name, now we need to decide what AVID looks like. Below, I've compiled most of the ideas we have so far. Vote for your favorite! Like before, feel free to add any additional ideas. Also, apologies for some of the images being so enormous. Those ones are Discord media links and I couldn't fix the dimnensions. Talk · Edits 23:59, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Proposal 1 - Designer: User:CalvinWilkerson
Support
Support My logo CalvinWilkerson (talk) 00:10, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Support AWM2004 (talk) 10:11, 28 September 2022 (UTC+3)
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
Proposal 2 - Designer: User:SHADOWNINJA
Support
Abstain
Oppose
- Oppose The color scheme looks too...coffee house, to me. Not saying it's a bad design, I'm just saying it could be better. RalstonSullivanMarshall (talk) 18:48, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Comments
Proposal 2 - Designer: User:SHADOWNINJA
Support
- Support The design flows really well (reminds me of 21 Laps all the time), and with the four colors intact, gives off a sense of professionalism and playfulness at the same time. Also, as with some other designs, this one is highly customizable too, and could be fit for any special occasions. PM pinter (talk) 00:16, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
Proposal 3 - Designer: User:TheAmigo67
Support
Abstain
Oppose
- Oppose As someone who wants to join the world of film and tv production, this logo makes me die inside. It's too reminicent of AVID technologies' logo and I personally cannot stand to use their software. It's so idiosyncratic and it's meant to be that way as it's supposed to keep novices out. It's meant for professionals and professionals only. This is coming from someone who is considered "AVID Certified". No dice. RalstonSullivanMarshall (talk) 00:27, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Comments
Proposal 3.1 - Designer: User:TheAmigo67
Support
- Support I love this one, because it keeps the old feel of the CLG while changing the logo to something modern and upbeat. CLGCreator Returns! (talk) 00:13, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support WCNY is in the background, 1000000/10 Obama hamburger (talk) 00:17, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Kid named WCNY: ★ Nova (talk) 01:42, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support This logo reminds me of the old CLG Wiki logo (back from the WikiFoundry days). IAmThe789Guy (talk) 00:21, 27 September 2022 (UTC) User:IAmThe789Guy (talk)
- Support per the previous two. This retains the CLG vibes. Nordlentille (talk) 00:53, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support I love the idea of keeping the colorful logos mosaic within the design. Jet Dzhet (talk) 03:18, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support I love how this still keeps the logo background, which help reflect the company's purpose. I like this logo overall. Doctorine Dark (talk) 03:22, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- SupportI like how the logo matches the background. The design of the logo is perfect, too. I'll definitely like to see this on the website. R.I.P CLG logo (2007-2022)
- Support I personally believe this is the way to go for a CLG rebrand. Not only is the logo really well-designed in my eyes, but the idea of maintaining that classic CLG background keeps a bit of the old while still feeling mostly new. This is honestly a win-win for me and I'd definitely love seeing it on the wiki. DannyTheMuppetMan 12:07, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support This is a mix of brandings both old and new. Many other brands should go down this "hybrid branding" route. HavocMan2000 7:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Very very good logo! I really like this! Sickminecraft45 (talk) 09:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support This looks like a fine logo. GPalmer (talk) 16:13, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support This design gets my vote because it keeps the spirit of the old CLG alive. Areyoutyler (talk) 16:47, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Abstain
abstain
Oppose
Comments
Proposal 4 - Designer: User:ELH
Support
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
Proposal 5 - Designer: User:Pudsp
Support
- Support I just really like the aesthetic and colors of this one. ShanuJackal (talk) 00:08, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support It's a very good idea: similar to the CLG Wiki logo but still its own thing. And the way we got here was quite the road with so many drafts. Hence why my vote goes with this one. Trevor807 (talk) 00:14, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support This is the one. Obama hamburger (talk) 00:15, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support My favorite so far. a.v.a. (talk) 00:27, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Very creative design! --DisneyInternationalFan (talk) 00:42, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support My choice, it's recognizable, has elements of the old CLG logo but still distinct. Though I agree it'd look better without a gradient Logohub (talk) 00:47, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support I love this logo. It feels fresh & it doesn't stray from our roots. KPyall (talk) 00:59, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Good design, though it'd be better if it was plain black CalvinWilkerson (talk) 01:05, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support I'm digging this! After seeing the creative process first-hand in the server, I gotta go with this. Feels somewhat similar to the old logo, but stands out enough where its it's own identity. Good stuff. FryLetterman (talk) 01:12, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support I REALLY LOVE THIS ONE :D HifiSara9000seven (talk) 01:25, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Mainly because it retains old CLG logo vibes which is an amazing throwback to this wiki's roots. ★ Nova (talk) 01:45, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support{{{1}}} I absolutely love the way the colors and the aesthetic of this logo stand out. The design is cool, too. Definitely put this on the website. User: Strxwberriesrweird
- Support Now this is a very eye catching identity! Airvibes (talk) 04:21, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Initially I was rooting for Colorband's proposal, but I thought that all the trial and error during its design phase just had to pay off eventually. For that reason, and the fact that this is a cool design, I'm voting for this one. <span style= "color:#f55197">[[User:Setrki Desu|'''SETRKI''']] *</span> <span style="color:#002f87">[[User_Talk:Setrki Desu|''talk_pag''e]] ~</span> (talk) 04:32, 27 September 2022 (UTC) (setrki deshita)
- Support Now this totally reminds me of the CLG Wiki. Support for nostalgia! Timpbskid23 4:42, 27 September 2022
- Support this feels like the perfect balance between the old brand and the future of the site. Huge fan of it! MinistrycraftEntertainment (talk) 11:34, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support This is the perfect mix of old and new! Robloxfan999 (talk) 11:40, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support I really love this colorful design! TheRealMarcel2000 (talk) 11:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support I can't wait to animate this. IlCattivo25 (talk) 12:36, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Looks amazing, in hopes this becomes official A7286584 (talk) 15:08, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support WOW! This logo is super colorful, i like it so much. This is a logo with a very attractive and perfect look.--Tobias Benson01 (talk) 17:23, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support This design is eye-popping I may say, while still true to the logo of the CLG name. Glad this is getting the most supports than the others. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 23:20, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support I love this! Esaïe the man (talk) 00:53, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Gotta love this new look! PokeRapMonster (talk) 05:14, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support THAT REMINDS ME OF AVID'S OLD LOOK,KEEP THE TRIDITIONAL AS WE THINK! ----MikeZhou49 MikeZhou49 11:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support This looks very creative and I'm loving the gradient design of this logo. TheOddKid2568 (talk 05:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support This logo is so awesome! And yet creative, too. Gives me CLG vibes, good work! SillenArchiveNPS (talk) 11:23, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support I like that design and colors tho. User:Cattotlebofficial (talk 15:40, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Very good. This isn't all "in-your-face" unlike most other logos I've seen, it gets the point across very well. Very, VERY brilliant work. TheAmigo67 (talk) 04:53, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support, but without the four-colour gradient as the default. Two colours or less may be better. --Pingu (talk) 17:47, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Abstain
- Abstain I know this logo is probably going to win, but I'm not gonna vote on it because one, I prefer (and also chose) Colorband's proposal and two, I'd hate to vote against a logo that went through a lot of trial and error but managed to come out looking good at the end. Nonetheless, I admire Pudsp's dedication to his design and sincerely wish him well on his graphic design stint. LurkingManiac (talk) 00:45, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Abstain I like this logo, but I don't love it, and I feel like it would be better if the colors in the logo was less of a gradient and more like stripes, like the Central Cake Logo. That's just my opinion though, and who am I to rule against the majority...even though that is a very punk thing to do. RalstonSullivanMarshall (talk) 18:45, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Oppose
- Oppose Meanwhile I do like this Logo the Icon Looks too similar to the Engineering of Arkansas Logo Poocian (talk) 18:53, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose To be honest the rainbow gradient makes it look kinda generic. Jet Dzhet (talk) 02:59, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Comments
I'd support this logo only if you got rid of the tacky rainbow gradient. --Axel (talk) 00:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- That's the beauty of it. :) 03:55, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- I like this one! =D TemaGub2002 (talk) 15:44, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Proposal 6 - Designer: User:NancerCLG
Support
- Support Retains the classic CLG design while being sleak and disconnected. Unsure why most people don't outwardly like this one. Obama hamburger (talk) 00:13, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support This one has been my favourite for awhile, it feels like a throwback to the old Transamerica/United Artists logo of the 1970s, while also harkening back to the old CLG days. In my honest opinion, this has been the only one that fully worked for me. --RalstonSullivanMarshall (talk) 00:16, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support I support this design because it's modern, it reminds me of the current CLG Wiki logo, and also has a modern touch to the wiki itself. EvelynFriedrich (talk) 00:20, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support This is really slick and timeless. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk)
- Support I support this design because it reminds me of the soon to be former CLG Wiki logo and I feel that as we move ahead into our new era, we should honour our history as a fan forum for closing logos, yet embrace our future as a database dedicated to the preservation of such logos. (Largerchips) 15:35 30 September 2022 (AEST)
Abstain
Oppose
- Oppose Honestly, the icons look like they could've come from anywhere, and the first logo only symbolizes the A, which is literally half of "Audiovisual." Overall, these logos feel quite lacking, undistinctive, and fail to recapture the spirit of the old CLG logo. 02:46, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Comments
Proposal 7 - Designer: User:NancerCLG
Support
- Support This is what should be used! It's too good not to be used especially if it's from Nancer. BootScreenFanatic - 27 September 2022, 12:49 AM UTC+2
- Support thank Etruongs7 (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
Proposal 8 - Designer: Spotlight (Discord)
Support
Abstain
Oppose
- Oppose This looks very dated, in my opinion. Very much looking like a bad VHS Company from the 80s. No offense. --RalstonSullivanMarshall (talk) 00:47, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose 2000's flash game Etruongs7 (talk) 15:50, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Comments
Proposal 9 - Designer: Plasticity (Discord)
Support
- Support This one I also seem to like alot! :) I'm surprised there's not much votes for this one. HifiSara9000seven (talk) 01:27, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support from the looks of it, it looks pretty cool in my opinion. --Tobias Benson01 (talk) 17:25, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support I like this one, I think it looks cool, i like the colours too Iheartparamount (talk) 00:58, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
Proposal 10 - Designer: Kinnard (Discord)
Support
- Support This is a good logo, reminds me of Sony VAIO. SillenArchiveNPS (talk) 11:26, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
Proposal 11 - Designer: Colorband (Discord)
Support
- Support This one's been my favorite for a while now. Talk · Edits 00:11, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support Mine as well LurkingManiac (talk) 00:16, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support I prefer this one If I were to be honest, I wouldn't even choose my logo lol. HifiSara9000seven (talk) 00:16, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support This is the perfect logo. LoganStuff (talk) 15:14, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
Proposal 12 - Designer: Colorband (Discord)
Support
- Support I think the 2000s-style design of this logo looks like a breath of fresh air to me. Also like the colours. Diskkihoax (talk) 21:05, 27 September 2022 (UTC).
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
Proposal 13 - Designer: User:HifiSara9000seven
Support
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
Just to let you guys know, I don't really like this one as much as I did before when I Created it. It may have been a good idea in my head, but I don't know. --HifiSara9000seven (talk) 01:09, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Proposal 14 - Designer: User:PuzonCLG
Support
Abstain
Abstain One side of me says "ehh", but the other says "this is one of your best friends choose that one". ★ Nova (talk) 02:13, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Oppose
- Oppose Not sure what this is supposed to be. Obama hamburger (talk) 00:16, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Reminds me of an early-2000s broadband internet provider. Trevor807 (talk) 05:30, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose LMAO I'm opposing my own logo. This was to make a point to that guy that he could make a non eye-bleeding Y2K logo. I might make a GENUINE one but it's probably too late anyways lol PuzonCLG (talk) 20:28, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Looks like an alien's Target anyway (Visit my talk page!) 07:21, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Comments
Proposal 15 - Designer: User:Setrki Desu
Support
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
Proposal 16 - Designer: User:Pantsmode
Support
Abstain
Oppose
- Oppose For a "masterful graphic designer with a prestigious portfolio of 5 public projects on behance", this is very simple and hard to read. Obama hamburger (talk) 00:20, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Same reason as Obama hamburger. Plus, it looks more like ᗡИD to me. Trevor807 (talk) 05:26, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with them also. HifiSara9000seven (talk) 06:48, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Comments
Proposal 17 - Designer: User:LMgamer36
Support
Abstain
Oppose
- Oppose ND LurkingManiac (talk) 05:20, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Comments
- This predates ELH's design btw (Visit my talk page!) 01:42, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- The fact there's no support option on this one.... oh no --HifiSara9000seven (talk) 06:57, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- That's now been fixed Talk · Edits 10:26, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Proposal 18 - Designer: User:JalvinGaming
Support
Abstain
Oppose
- Oppose Sorry but it's kind of a mess to me. Not very readable. Trevor807 (talk) 17:00, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Nope nope nope nope nopeity nope CalvinWilkerson (talk) 02:57, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose instant ramen brand Etruongs7 (talk) 15:47, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Comments
Proposal 19 - Designer: User:Poocian
Support
Abstain
Oppose
- Oppose While it's simple, the font makes it more of a logo from the 90s. (Visit my talk page!) 01:33, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Comments
Proposal 20 - Designer: User:PokeRapMonster
Support
Abstain
Oppose
- Oppose Too simple. Doctorine Dark (talk) 02:06, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Makes it look like a Google product either. (Visit my talk page!) 03:55, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Comments
Proposal 21 - Designer: User:Poocian
Support
Abstain
Oppose
- Oppose Colors too 1990s internet-like, bad attempts at overlapping the letters, and trying to merge the I with the D makes it read "AVD". Trevor807 (talk) 04:33, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Comments
Proposal 22 - Designer: User:RedBall
Support
Abstain
Oppose
Comments
Proposal 23 - Designer: User:Lappy4861
Support
Abstain
Oppose
- Oppose Bruh? CalvinWilkerson (talk) 23:46, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Why. 23:55, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Not only is the logo bad, but even if it were good it's a bit late anyway. Trevor807 (talk) 04:32, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Crappy MSPaint Style!talk(UTC)
- Oppose how old are you Etruongs7 (talk) 15:46, 30 September 2022 (UTC)