Talk:Nintendo Films: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Latest comment: 1 year ago by AlmightyKingPrawn in topic Proposed plan for Nintendo Pictures logo
Content deleted Content added
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I say that when the trailer for the upcoming "Super Mario Bros." film (aware that it might not be the official title) releases, and if it does contain a Nintendo Pictures logo, we make "Nintendo Pictures" a separate section from "Nintendo Films" with it's own background section as well. |
I say that when the trailer for the upcoming "Super Mario Bros." film (aware that it might not be the official title) releases, and if it does contain a Nintendo Pictures logo, we make "Nintendo Pictures" a separate section from "Nintendo Films" with it's own background section as well. |
||
[[User:Nova|Nova]] ([[User talk:Nova|talk]]) 00:15, 22 September 2022 (UTC) |
[[User:Nova|Nova]] ([[User talk:Nova|talk]]) 00:15, 22 September 2022 (UTC) |
||
:I agree, it should be a separate page. [[User:AlmightyKingPrawn|AlmightyKingPrawn]] ([[User talk:AlmightyKingPrawn|talk]]) 04:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:26, 22 September 2022
Proposed plan for Nintendo Pictures logo
As you might already know, Nintendo is in the process of acquiring Dynamo Pictures, and will rebrand said company to "Nintendo Pictures". I say that when the trailer for the upcoming "Super Mario Bros." film (aware that it might not be the official title) releases, and if it does contain a Nintendo Pictures logo, we make "Nintendo Pictures" a separate section from "Nintendo Films" with it's own background section as well. Nova (talk) 00:15, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- I agree, it should be a separate page. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 04:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)