Talk:Nintendo Films: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Latest comment: 1 year ago by AlmightyKingPrawn in topic Proposed plan for Nintendo Pictures logo

Content deleted Content added
Nova (talk | contribs)
Line 4: Line 4:
I say that when the trailer for the upcoming "Super Mario Bros." film (aware that it might not be the official title) releases, and if it does contain a Nintendo Pictures logo, we make "Nintendo Pictures" a separate section from "Nintendo Films" with it's own background section as well.
I say that when the trailer for the upcoming "Super Mario Bros." film (aware that it might not be the official title) releases, and if it does contain a Nintendo Pictures logo, we make "Nintendo Pictures" a separate section from "Nintendo Films" with it's own background section as well.
[[User:Nova|Nova]] ([[User talk:Nova|talk]]) 00:15, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
[[User:Nova|Nova]] ([[User talk:Nova|talk]]) 00:15, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

:I agree, it should be a separate page. [[User:AlmightyKingPrawn|AlmightyKingPrawn]] ([[User talk:AlmightyKingPrawn|talk]]) 04:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:26, 22 September 2022

As you might already know, Nintendo is in the process of acquiring Dynamo Pictures, and will rebrand said company to "Nintendo Pictures". I say that when the trailer for the upcoming "Super Mario Bros." film (aware that it might not be the official title) releases, and if it does contain a Nintendo Pictures logo, we make "Nintendo Pictures" a separate section from "Nintendo Films" with it's own background section as well. Nova (talk) 00:15, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

I agree, it should be a separate page. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 04:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.