Talk:Nintendo Films: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Latest comment: 1 year ago by CharlieFiddlesticks in topic Proposed plan for Nintendo Pictures logo

Content deleted Content added
m Anticritic12 moved page Talk:Nintendo Films (Japan) to Talk:Nintendo Films: (Japan) has been removed from the game
Line 6: Line 6:


:I agree, it should be a separate page. [[User:AlmightyKingPrawn|AlmightyKingPrawn]] ([[User talk:AlmightyKingPrawn|talk]]) 04:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
:I agree, it should be a separate page. [[User:AlmightyKingPrawn|AlmightyKingPrawn]] ([[User talk:AlmightyKingPrawn|talk]]) 04:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
::I also {{Support}} that we should do this [[File:Charlie fiddlesticks signature.png|200px|link=User:CharlieFiddlesticks]] ([[User talk:CharlieFiddlesticks|lets talks]]) 19:38, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:38, 21 November 2022

As you might already know, Nintendo is in the process of acquiring Dynamo Pictures, and will rebrand said company to "Nintendo Pictures". I say that when the trailer for the upcoming "Super Mario Bros." film (aware that it might not be the official title) releases, and if it does contain a Nintendo Pictures logo, we make "Nintendo Pictures" a separate section from "Nintendo Films" with it's own background section as well. Nova (talk) 00:15, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

I agree, it should be a separate page. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 04:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
I also Support that we should do this (lets talks) 19:38, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.