User talk:A.Donaire logos 1

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Revision as of 15:01, 1 September 2024 by A.Donaire logos 1 (talk | contribs) (→‎My Second Return: Reply)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Latest comment: 27 days ago by A.Donaire logos 1 in topic My Second Return

Welcome!




Welcome to the Audiovisual Identity Database (AVID), A.Donaire logos 1!

Let's get started, shall we?



The dos and don'ts of the site. Please follow them.


Learn the proper formatting guidelines for writing articles.


Meet the Site Staff, including Mods, Admins and Crats.


Write articles on these undocumented audiovisual identities to help the site out.


Answering some of the most commonly asked questions about AVID.


Happy editing! -


-- WelcomeBot (talk) 21:28, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Regarding your recent section addition

Information icon Hello, A.Donaire logos 1. Please don't publish blank or otherwise unfinished sections to mainspace articles as you did with Aardman Animations/Logo Variations, as we don't desire such additions for quality control reasons. In the future, please work on any unfinished sections in your provided sandbox, which you may find in the dropdown menu located next to your username on the top bar. Thank you! Camenati (talk) 22:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

This is your second warning after your section addition to Aardman Animations. Camenati (talk) 16:54, 16 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
This is your third warning after your section additions to Yung Hwa Motion Picture Industries. Continuing this behavior may result in a block. Camenati (talk) 20:47, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification of temporary sitewide block



Next time, please try to develop these incomplete descriptions in your associated userpages/sandbox and visit the page's talk page to ask for assistance in regarding a section you are having trouble describing. Creating them directly in mainspace will deliver these articles for general viewing, which will mislead readers hoping to gain any information regarding the company's logos. During the duration of this ban, I suggest you read the site rules to understand more about incomplete descriptions and other rules to avoid so that you do not end up getting another ban in the future. Until then, we'll see you again when you return to the wiki. Camenati (talk) 18:49, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Warning regarding incomplete sections in mainspace

Hello, A.Donaire logos 1. It appears you are continuing to insert incomplete sections in mainspace with your additions to Lucernafilm. Please create these type of sections on your associated userpages, as adding them in mainspace will deliver these articles for general viewing, which will mislead readers hoping to gain any information regarding their logos. There is also a good chance these sections will be long neglected due to the amount of incomplete sections added or due to the complexity in describing them, which in turn will portray the wiki as lazy. If you continue to violate this rule, you may be blocked for a longer period of time. Thank you. Camenati (talk) 21:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification of temporary sitewide block



Hello, A.Donaire logos 1. It has come to my attention you have added another incomplete section in mainspace with your documentation of a logo variation (specifically The Nice Guys variant) in the Silver Pictures/Trailer Variations page. Considering the new direction you have taken in expanding the wiki with your logo variations captures, which is an appreciated path that showed a lot of promise from your recent contributions, this is rather disappointing. Taking into account the previous warning issued on your account, you have been temporarily blocked again. During the duration of this ban, considering incompleteness is a struggle, I suggest thinking about other logos containing a similar element to a logo you are having trouble describing, read its description, and implement how said aspect was described on that logo onto the description of the capture you are expanding upon. That, or researching objects in a logo on a search engine is also helpful. Until then, please take this time to practice identifying logo elements such as colors, objects, etc. and I'll see you again when you return to the wiki. Camenati (talk) 23:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Regarding Your Video on the New Line Cinema Page

Hi. I wanted to firstly thank you for providing a high-definition capture of the recently debuted New Line Cinema logo. I must however ask that you upload a version with the music that accompanied it on debut, as the video currently attached to the page qualifies as a fake due to your inclusion of the traditional NLC Fanfare. Thanks in advance. EMG/Ram (She/They) (Let's Chat!) 14:30, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Warning regarding pages with no documented logos

Hello, A.Donaire logos 1. It appears you have created a page that appears to have no logo variations listed. This can also be considered a violation of AVID's blank rule policy, as it serves the same purpose as creating a page with no descriptions. If a general reader were to search up this page or visit it, hoping to view a list of logo variations, they will find nothing, which is what we do not desire especially considering the potential of disappointing or underwhelming them. In the future, if there are no logo variations listed on such a subpage, please create it in draftspace, so that they can be completed there without having to worry about disappointing readers with nothing. Taking into account your previous blank/incomplete rule violations, continued rule breaking may result in another temporary and lengthier ban. Thank you for your understanding. Camenati (talk) 21:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Temporary sitewide block notice



As you have been told from your previous warning, "continued rule breaking may result in another temporary and lengthier ban". In this case, AVID does not permit the use of recreations in articles, as they may also fall under the "fictious logos" category. Recreated images are also bound to be fake and will be a result of the wiki spreading false information through these captures where even one slight detail can be considered inaccurate. Considering you have broken another rule on the wiki, I strongly suggest re-visiting the site rules and tutorial guide to read more about what to avoid when editing on the wiki. Until then, please take this time to understand these rules and we'll see you when you return to the wiki. Camenati (talk) 16:01, 16 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

My Return

I'm Back, everybody! 2 Weeks of blocked, i'm free this time. A.Donaire logos 1 (talk) 16:21, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Regarding your capture additions on Studio Pierrot

Hello A.Donaire logos 1. Please keep in mind that due to a recently passed RFC, duplicate logos are not allowed. This includes in-credit logos that have the same exact appearance with each other. Thank you. Logoarto (talk) 17:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

No Probelmo (in Italina saids: No Problem) A.Donaire logos 1 (talk) 17:19, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Also, if you want to add captures to a logo which already has captures, you do not need to draftify it as it will hide the page from mainspace and thus Google search. Logoarto (talk) 17:20, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Wait what? A.Donaire logos 1 (talk) 17:20, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
You have been warned again for uploading captures nearly identical to one another after your uploads of "File:Tatsunoko Productions (1993 - The Irresponsible Captain Tylor, Closing).jpg". Camenati (talk) 18:26, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oops, sorry very much, Camenati, i'm will fix A.Donaire logos 1 (talk) 18:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oh, so you fixed, oh right A.Donaire logos 1 (talk) 18:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Strong warning regarding editing guidelines

Hello, A.Donaire logos 1. 2 weeks have passed since your last ban and unfortunately, it looks like you have broken another rule, specifically edit warring on the Aniplex Inc. by reinstating a few removed captures added by yourself. This is when users disagree over the content of an article and repeatedly revert each other's edits. This type of editing is disruptive and unproductive. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page before editing further. After multiple violations, especially this one, I am giving you a strong warning and imploration to re-read the site rules to understand what is allowed and not allowed when editing on the wiki. Continued rule breaking will result in another lengthier ban. Please ensure your comeback continues and tread carefully. Camenati (talk) 22:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Don't Worry, I'm fixed again that, You're going to forgive me now, eh?, Camenati?, I must continue to follow your rules A.Donaire logos 1 (talk) 22:23, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Temporary sitewide block notice



It looks like you have bumped into yet another fault with image-related guidelines, in this case being an upload of a watermarked capture (File:RAVE Production Committee - TBS (2002 - Rave Master) (Episode 26-51, Opening) (Fullscreen).png), despite the fact you have uploaded a version of it with the exact same shot with no watermark. Per AVID:IMAGES, they are not permitted for quality control reasons. Similarly, it looks like you have been using draftspace to continue publishing duplicate captures despite previous reminders telling you they are no longer desired, as they can clog up the gallery and make specific variants harder to find in said section. Although this is draftspace and it is used to gradually expand and learn from issues that do not abide with editing guidelines, in this case, you seem to be well aware they are not allowed, but continue to do so anyway through a different namespace; it is clearly hypocritical and an instance of poor and disrespectful user conduct.
Due to the above reasons, you have been blocked again, this time even longer than your previous ban. If you have or have not re-read the site rules and tutorial guide, it is a great opportunity to understand practice applying them during the duration of this ban. This also includes thoroughly checking the links provided in the latter page, as there could be more rules in place regarding captures and more. However, you are the type of person who does listen and at least tries their best to improve in spite of the slip ups they make once in a while. That is something I can give that keeps my hope remaining healthy for your editing habits. Because you are the type of person who does pay attention and do their best to avoid breaking the rules further, a few more chances will be in place when you return. Continuing to break those promises may lead to an indefinite ban (which I must warn is the last ban you will receive and it is not something to take lightly). When you return, I hope that improved behavior arrives and solid obedience continues. Thank you for your time. Camenati (talk) 07:59, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

You can't block me, if I'm innocent, what I uploaded was not a Mockup or recreation image, but rather it was the original, what happens is that it is in poor quality and I forgot to delete the watermark, please cancel the block to upload images but this time before uploading to the wiki, I will have to delete the watermarks from the logo images A.Donaire logos 1 (talk) 09:18, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Alright, I understand if this was accidental. However, what else remains in this block is the continued uploading of duplicate captures, especially by using draftspace with the hope a ban or another warning would not be issued. This is despite a few reminders and warnings telling you they are no longer allowed. Camenati (talk) 16:19, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

My Second Return

I'm Back, everybody! 1 month of blocked, i'm free, but this time i'm respect to the Rules and I'm uploding images without Watermarks. A.Donaire logos 1 (talk) 07:59, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

You're still uploading duplicate images.
Duplicate in-credit text is when the in-credit text of 2 images or more has the same configuration. ILEnthusiast (talk) 13:48, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
But ILEnthusiast, I have already decided not to upload images with watermarks, not to upload mockups or recreations, and I have already respected the site rules so as not to be blocked again and I had to wait more like the last time. A.Donaire logos 1 (talk) 14:00, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I know you didn't upload watermarks, no recreations, but you're still uploading duplicate images. ILEnthusiast (talk) 14:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I know, but the background of the Anime openings and endings are different with different angles and poses of the In-Credits logos. A.Donaire logos 1 (talk) 14:04, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
If the captures are nearly identical in appearance even with slight differences, they can still be considered duplicates and clog up the galleries. I, alongside plenty of other users, have been noticing you are continuing that particularly in draftspace when that is one of the main reasons why you were blocked besides uploading a watermarked capture. In this regard, I must warn you that if you continue to upload nearly identical captures and use them in either mainspace or draftspace, I'm afraid you will no longer be able to upload images. Camenati (talk) 14:31, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Camenati, forgive me, and now I have to read your site rules, I have to read the rules now, please don't block me again *Crying* A.Donaire logos 1 (talk) 14:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Forgive me Camenati, I have to read your site rules to do what you say, I will not take screenshots with duplicate logos, and please do not block me, I have to read the rules to continue uploading images that comply with the rules and that I am about to read and respect you. A.Donaire logos 1 (talk) 14:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I am trusting you this time, but as we have noted, duplicate captures are not permitted on the wiki. Not just through almost sharing the exact same appearance visually but also how the placement and look of the logo by itself (in this case being in-credit) does not vary on each source. For instance, take a look at this draft you have created and focus on the images. If all of these images' backgrounds were solid black instead of a random shot of the anime's opening, would you still embed them in the article? Do readers need around ten images of the exact same logo but with different backgrounds? Remember, when making a large gallery of logos, make sure the logos themselves gain the largest priority. Otherwise, the galleries will be summed up as a collection of anime OP screenshots instead of a logo showcase. Camenati (talk) 14:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Okay, Camenati, I'm trying to follow your rules. A.Donaire logos 1 (talk) 15:01, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
The anime openings and endings themselves aren't considered part of the logo. Logoarto (talk) 14:32, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Forgive me Logoarto. A.Donaire logos 1 (talk) 14:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.