User talk:DogeDestroyer

Welcome!

Welcome to the Audiovisual Identity Database (AVID), DogeDestroyer!

Let's get started, shall we?

Site Rules

The dos and don'ts of the site. Please follow them.

Tutorials

Learn the proper formatting guidelines for writing articles.

Site Staff

Meet the Site Staff, including Mods, Admins and Crats.

Page Requests

Write articles on these undocumented audiovisual identities to help the site out.

FAQ

Answering some of the most commonly asked questions about AVID.

Happy editing! -

-- New user message (talk) 16:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Regarding your section addition to Regal Cinemas

Hello, DogeDestroyer. Please don't publish blank or otherwise unfinished sections to mainspace articles as you did with Regal Cinemas, as we don't desire such additions for quality control reasons. In the future, please work on any unfinished sections in your provided sandbox, which you may find in the dropdown menu located next to your username on the top bar. Thank you! Camenati (talk) 04:03, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I was trying to add 2 more openings I found but for some strange reason, when I left the descriptions with TBA, since I didn't had that much time to think of a good opening description, AVID didn't allow me to publish it, so I had to leave the video there with that opening's description, etc. unfinished. Please don't report or get me in trouble. I have been trying hard to avoid the problems from 2022 as Grimparsley2672. DogeDestroyer (talk) 15:43, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

This is your second warning on the issue after you attempted to add multiple blank sections to Cinépolis. Camenati (talk) 02:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Regarding your recent section addition

Hello, DogeDestroyer. Your recent section addition appears to be missing examples. Simply stating "found on their releases" is a form of section misuse that doesn't give any specific information where it can be found. Please keep that in mind, as readers want to know what specific releases contain the bumper. Also, we no longer allow the use of POV terms such as "we see" as they set the article in a conversational tone, something we have been trying to shift away from and more towards formality. For more details on what to avoid, look back on the tutorial guide. Thank you. Camenati (talk) 20:59, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Pathe logo

So it seems that on the AVID Discord there is debate as to whether the video embed you added is a real find or not. Can you explain how it was found? I believe that is also your channel. For the record, I think it's real, it's just that people thing it looks fake. EDIT: Starting to have my own doubts now that it has been pointed out that the static is identical to Mr. Gann's Pathe Video capture, please reply and explain whether you edited the "video" text out of the capture or not. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 02:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

The Pathe logo you "found" is fake.

Hi DogeDestroyer, the Pathe logo you found is a fake. It is badly edited and has the same artifacts as the ones on Mr Gann's upload of the Pathe Video/Chargeurs logos. When the logo fades out, the rectangle below "PATHE" is in a different quality from the rest of the logo. Falsifying logo finds is a violation of our editing guidelines and may result in a block. Thank you. Logoarto (talk) 13:35, 25 June 2024 (UTC)