User talk:IAmThe789Guy: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Latest comment: 1 year ago by EternityMediaGroup in topic Reminder regarding blocking underage users

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
==Reminder Regarding Deletion of RFC Pages==
==Reminder Regarding Deletion of RFC Pages==
Hi there! Just a quick reminder that you shouldn't delete an RFC that you wish to retract, but rather wait for another member of staff to close. This has been the standard for the entirety of the RFC system's usage on the wiki, and we aren't going to change it now. Thanks! [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 00:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi there! Just a quick reminder that you shouldn't delete an RFC that you wish to retract, but rather wait for another member of staff to close. This has been the standard for the entirety of the RFC system's usage on the wiki, and we aren't going to change it now. Thanks! [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 00:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
==Reminder regarding blocking underage users==
Hi there, I've noticed thst you've blocked a user for being underage. Just as a reminder, you should not block users for being underage, as Miraheze staff will need to unblock so they can globally lock tbe account. If a block is required due to said underage user causing mischief, do not mention that they are underage in the reasoning. Thanks! [[File:Eternity Media Group Wordmark.png|100px|link=User:EternityMediaGroup]] ([[User Talk:EternityMediaGroup|Lets chat!]]) 01:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:46, 2 April 2023

Regarding your edits on AVID:User Reports and AVID:Requests for CheckUser

Hello IAmThe789Guy. Just wanted to let you know that instead of removing reports completely you could strikethrough it with <s>(message)</s>. Thank you Logohub (talk) 14:10, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the reminder. I'll keep that in mind. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 21:52, 20 December 2022 (UTC) IAmThe789GuyReply

Regarding your edits on Taffy Entertainment

Information icon Hi, IAmThe789Guy. It appears you are engaging in an edit war at Taffy Entertainment. This is when users disagree over the content of an article and repeatedly revert each other's edits. This type of editing is disruptive and unproductive. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page before editing further. Thank You. Logohub (talk) 01:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the warning, and I'll keep that in mind for the future. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 01:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Do not remove people from the credits

Please do not remove people from the page credits whether they're blocked on the site or not, if they are involved with the logo descriptions. Logohub (talk) 04:36, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

You should also tell that to SuperMax124, as he removed Prodigy012 from a number of pages. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 16:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Also I removed Prodigy a number of times, and no one noticed until now. Why did you only take note in when I removed Blue2000, but when I removed Prodigy012, you didn't mind then? IAmThe789Guy (talk) 16:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Reminder Regarding Deletion of RFC Pages

Hi there! Just a quick reminder that you shouldn't delete an RFC that you wish to retract, but rather wait for another member of staff to close. This has been the standard for the entirety of the RFC system's usage on the wiki, and we aren't going to change it now. Thanks! (Lets chat!) 00:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Reminder regarding blocking underage users

Hi there, I've noticed thst you've blocked a user for being underage. Just as a reminder, you should not block users for being underage, as Miraheze staff will need to unblock so they can globally lock tbe account. If a block is required due to said underage user causing mischief, do not mention that they are underage in the reasoning. Thanks! (Lets chat!) 01:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.