User talk:LiamRobinostv: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Tag: Reply |
||
Line 62:
Hello, LiamRobinostv. Please do not remove other people's comments without permission, which includes reminders or warnings issued on your user talk page. This is considered disruptive and can potentially start conflict between the offending user. If the comment is spam or a personal attack, then it can be removed per [[AVID:TALK]]. However, the case here is that it was a reminder about a specific rule, which does not fall in either category. Taking into account previous RFC related reminders about removing the RFC Draft template without permission from staff and closing an RFC in spite of only staff having the capability of doing so, continued rule violations may result in a temporary block. For more rules to keep in mind to steer clear of a possible ban, read the [[AVID:Site Rules|site rules]] and [[AVID:Tutorials|tutorial guide]]. Thank you. [[User:Camenati|Camenati]] ([[User talk:Camenati|talk]]) 01:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
:okay [[User:LiamRobinostv|LiamRobinostv]] ([[User talk:LiamRobinostv|talk]]) 23:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
|
Revision as of 23:08, 30 October 2024
Welcome!
Camenati (talk) 20:34, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Regarding your recent section addition
Hello, LiamRobinostv. Please don't publish blank or otherwise unfinished sections to mainspace articles as you did with Climb Films, as we don't desire such additions for quality control reasons. In the future, please work on any unfinished sections in your provided sandbox, which you may find in the dropdown menu located next to your username on the top bar. Thank you! Camenati (talk) 01:25, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Warning regarding removal of other people's messages
Hello, LiamRobinostv. Please do not remove other people's comments without permission, which includes reminders or warnings issued on your user talk page. This is considered disruptive and can potentially start conflict between the offending user. If the comment is spam or a personal attack, then it can be removed per AVID:TALK. However, the case here is that it was a reminder about a specific rule, which does not fall in either category. Taking into account previous RFC related reminders about removing the RFC Draft template without permission from staff and closing an RFC in spite of only staff having the capability of doing so, continued rule violations may result in a temporary block. For more rules to keep in mind to steer clear of a possible ban, read the site rules and tutorial guide. Thank you. Camenati (talk) 01:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)