User talk:LiamRobinostv

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Revision as of 23:08, 30 October 2024 by LiamRobinostv (talk | contribs) (→‎Regarding your recent section addition: Reply)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Latest comment: 5 days ago by LiamRobinostv in topic Warning regarding removal of other people's messages

Welcome!




Welcome to the Audiovisual Identity Database (AVID), {{{name}}}!

Let's get started, shall we?



The dos and don'ts of the site. Please follow them.


Learn the proper formatting guidelines for writing articles.


Meet the Site Staff, including Mods, Admins and Crats.


Write articles on these undocumented audiovisual identities to help the site out.


Answering some of the most commonly asked questions about AVID.


Happy editing! -



Camenati (talk) 20:34, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Regarding your recent section addition

Information icon Hello, LiamRobinostv. Please don't publish blank or otherwise unfinished sections to mainspace articles as you did with Climb Films, as we don't desire such additions for quality control reasons. In the future, please work on any unfinished sections in your provided sandbox, which you may find in the dropdown menu located next to your username on the top bar. Thank you! Camenati (talk) 01:25, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

okay unblocked me please LiamRobinostv (talk) 23:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Warning regarding removal of other people's messages

Hello, LiamRobinostv. Please do not remove other people's comments without permission, which includes reminders or warnings issued on your user talk page. This is considered disruptive and can potentially start conflict between the offending user. If the comment is spam or a personal attack, then it can be removed per AVID:TALK. However, the case here is that it was a reminder about a specific rule, which does not fall in either category. Taking into account previous RFC related reminders about removing the RFC Draft template without permission from staff and closing an RFC in spite of only staff having the capability of doing so, continued rule violations may result in a temporary block. For more rules to keep in mind to steer clear of a possible ban, read the site rules and tutorial guide. Thank you. Camenati (talk) 01:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

okay LiamRobinostv (talk) 23:08, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.