User talk:Shakla: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum

Latest comment: 1 year ago by IAmThe789Guy in topic Unblock Request

Content deleted Content added
imported>Shakla
removed juvenile, unfounded insults
Camenati (talk | contribs)
Undo revision 413752 by Shakla (talk) they're not insults, you can't seem to accept criticism
Line 36: Line 36:


{{unblock|I never received a warming on my talk page. I was not rude to anyone. My edits were all within guidelines and helpful to the pages.}} [[User:Shakla|Shakla]] ([[User talk:Shakla|talk]]) 01:52, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|I never received a warming on my talk page. I was not rude to anyone. My edits were all within guidelines and helpful to the pages.}} [[User:Shakla|Shakla]] ([[User talk:Shakla|talk]]) 01:52, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
* Expect you did get warnings and was disruptive. You’re pretty much one of those users that don't what's going on yet others do. [[User:BaldiBasicsFan|BaldiBasicsFan]] ([[User talk:BaldiBasicsFan|talk]]) 02:03, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
* Sorry, Shak, but rules are rules. We all witnessed you being rude to several of us. You have to accept your block. [[User:IAmThe789Guy|IAmThe789Guy]] ([[User talk:IAmThe789Guy|talk]]) 02:28, 4 December 2022 (UTC) IAmThe789Guy

Revision as of 05:45, 4 December 2022

Welcome!




Welcome to the Audiovisual Identity Database (AVID), Shakla!

Let's get started, shall we?



The dos and don'ts of the site. Please follow them.


Learn the proper formatting guidelines for writing articles.


Meet the Site Staff, including Mods, Admins and Crats.


Write articles on these undocumented audiovisual identities to help the site out.


Answering some of the most commonly asked questions about AVID.


Happy editing! -


-- New user message (talk) 18:56, 4 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

October 2022

Hello I never met you before but it seems you removed the editor's note section on some articles and most content had also been removed. I revert them some articles. Blue2000 (talk) 18:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Shakla, you reverted my edits without telling me why and if you do this again you will be blocked from editing. Blue2000 (talk) 08:59, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

The word "short-lived" is not a redundant term it's been used for other articles on this wiki. Now please stop doing this or you will be blocked the next time you do it. Blue2000 (talk) 12:11, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your edits are seem to be disruptive editing. If you disruptive this wiki again you will be blocked from editing. Blue2000 (talk) 12:13, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

You will be blocked the next you disruptive AVID. Blue2000 (talk) 12:13, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

All of the articles had to be reverted becuase of your disruptive editing removing words that are allowed on this wiki. I told you to stop but you didnt. Blue2000 (talk) 12:27, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

You disobeying the warning that Logohub said to you. Don't you dare revert my edits ever again! Because your edits are actually disruptive editing after all! Blue2000 (talk) 13:32, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Warning

Information icon Hi, Shakla. It appears you are engaging in an edit war at Group W Productions. This is when users disagree over the content of an article and repeatedly revert each other's edits. This type of editing is disruptive and unproductive. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page before editing further. Thank You. Logohub (talk) 12:59, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Please stop repeatedly reverting other people's edits as you have been at Northern Lights Entertainment. Your behavior is considered edit warring and will result in a block if it continues. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 20:33, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

What do you even mean by "unfounded reviews"?

I'm pretty sure the Legacy section works like YMMV on TV Tropes, where if it is just the editor's sole opinion or overtly gushy or complaint it gets cut, while writings on reception with consensus that are written neutrally can stay. There is basis to the legacies on Traveller's Tales you cut, I have seen many people even outside the logo community consider the later logo a downgrade. I even remember a tweet with over 1000 likes labeled "name a bigger downgrade" with both of the logos. I really do not like your "cut every legacy about reception to a logo I come across even if it may possibly be valid" approach. The wiki has become significantly less colorful and more bland and boring to read because of what you've done, and TV Tropes proves a balance is possible. I especially dislike how you do all this, yet keep nicknames and FX/SFX sections that describe the logo intact, which I think are more serious and should-be-prioritized issues than the reception based legacy sections (nicknames make us look far more childish than any legacy section, while the deluge of FX/SFX describing the logo is redundant). I confess I will likely never agree with you, but please, explain yourself. If other people like the admins can chime in to further explain which of us is in the wrong here that would be great. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 17:24, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Regarding recent talk page edit

Hello, I have reverted your recent edit to your talk page for now, as it removed talk page messages from other users and without a given reason, which is forbidden per our rules on talk page conduct. In the future, please do not remove talk page messages from other users unless they fall under one of the listed exceptions given in the Rules page unless you have permission from an administrator. If you are okay with answering, why did you remove these messages from your talk page? HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 18:44, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Request

Shakla is asking that their block be reviewed.

Shakla (block logactive blocksglobal blocks (for IP users)contribsdeleted contribschange block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

I never received a warming on my talk page. I was not rude to anyone. My edits were all within guidelines and helpful to the pages.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and notify an administrator as soon as possible.
  • Make sure that your unblock request will help your case. Try to provide sufficient sound reasoning as to why your block should be appealed. You may change your request at any time.
Shakla (talk) 01:52, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.