|
-- [[User:New user message|New user message]] ([[User talk:New user message|talk]]) 18:56, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
== October 2022 ==
Hello I never met you before but it seems you removed the editor's note section on some articles and most content had also been removed. I revert them some articles. [[User:Blue2000|Blue2000]] ([[User talk:Blue2000|talk]]) 18:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Shakla, you reverted my edits without telling me why and if you do this again you will be blocked from editing. [[User:Blue2000|Blue2000]] ([[User talk:Blue2000|talk]]) 08:59, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
The word "short-lived" is not a redundant term it's been used for other articles on this wiki. Now please stop doing this or you will be blocked the next time you do it. [[User:Blue2000|Blue2000]] ([[User talk:Blue2000|talk]]) 12:11, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Your edits are seem to be disruptive editing. If you disruptive this wiki again you will be blocked from editing. [[User:Blue2000|Blue2000]] ([[User talk:Blue2000|talk]]) 12:13, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
You will be blocked the next you disruptive AVID. [[User:Blue2000|Blue2000]] ([[User talk:Blue2000|talk]]) 12:13, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
All of the articles had to be reverted becuase of your disruptive editing removing words that are allowed on this wiki. I told you to stop but you didnt. [[User:Blue2000|Blue2000]] ([[User talk:Blue2000|talk]]) 12:27, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
You disobeying the warning that Logohub said to you. Don't you dare revert my edits ever again! Because your edits are actually disruptive editing after all! [[User:Blue2000|Blue2000]] ([[User talk:Blue2000|talk]]) 13:32, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
== Warning ==
{{uw-editwar|Group W Productions}} ''[[User:Logohub|<span style="font-size: 120%;"><span style="font-family:'serif';">Logohub</span></span>]]'' ([[User talk:Logohub|talk]]) 12:59, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
:{{uw-editwar-2|Northern Lights Entertainment}} [[User:HibiscusCrown20|HibiscusCrown20]] ([[User talk:HibiscusCrown20|talk]]) 20:33, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
== What do you even mean by "unfounded reviews"? ==
I'm pretty sure the Legacy section works like YMMV on TV Tropes, where if it is just the editor's sole opinion or overtly gushy or complaint it gets cut, while writings on reception with consensus that are written neutrally can stay. There is basis to the legacies on Traveller's Tales you cut, I have seen many people even outside the logo community consider the later logo a downgrade. I even remember a tweet with over 1000 likes labeled "name a bigger downgrade" with both of the logos. I really do not like your "cut every legacy about reception to a logo I come across even if it may possibly be valid" approach. The wiki has become significantly less colorful and more bland and boring to read because of what you've done, and TV Tropes proves a balance is possible. I especially dislike how you do all this, yet keep nicknames and FX/SFX sections that describe the logo intact, which I think are more serious and should-be-prioritized issues than the reception based legacy sections (nicknames make us look far more childish than any legacy section, while the deluge of FX/SFX describing the logo is redundant). I confess I will likely never agree with you, but please, explain yourself. If other people like the admins can chime in to further explain which of us is in the wrong here that would be great. [[User:AlmightyKingPrawn|AlmightyKingPrawn]] ([[User talk:AlmightyKingPrawn|talk]]) 17:24, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
| 
