AVID:Requests for Comment/Add "(tentative)" for logos yet to debut
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Add "(tentative)" for logos yet to debut
So yeah, I have seen that Logopedia puts "(tentative)" for logos that are yet to make their official debut; see example here. Well I was planning this should also be done on AVID. How does that sound?
PS: For examples, you can look at my sandbox here.
11:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Support
Abstain
Abstain I think we should aim to not be too similar to Logopedia personally. Some implementations, such as ImageTOC and Chronology have proven useful, but I fear that pushing for further similarities would lead to a bad reputation for us amongst LP users. 
(Lets chat!) 11:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)- Abstain per EMG.
· Talk · Edits 23:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Abstain Per everyone ForcedExcess26 (talk) 23:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose I'm going to be perfectly real here, how would we even implement this? If a logo debuts on-screen, the date of when that happens should be the first release date for the logo, we shouldn't need a "tentative". This would really only work for print logos on Logopedia and I feel like this won't translate well into AVID's focus of animated, on-screen logos. Compooper (talk) 23:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- precisely. This would only work in fringe cases where the logo is revealed before its first usage (Disney100, for example). We shouldn't implement something that would be used on 1 in every 500 pages at best. (Lets chat!) 01:58, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- precisely. This would only work in fringe cases where the logo is revealed before its first usage (Disney100, for example). We shouldn't implement something that would be used on 1 in every 500 pages at best.
