AVID:Requests for Comment/Availability rename: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
Created page with "{{subst:RfC Page|Why rename Availability?|I wasn't aware of a recent revamp until very recently. But I would've support it as I'm sick of the Availability scale. Anyways given its current direction, I honestly think it should be renamed into something like "Sources". The "Availability" term just sounds kinda ridiculous at this point, so I think it needed to be changed to sound more simple and better. Also, terms like "rare" and "common" should still be in use, but..."
 
mNo edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
Also, terms like "rare" and "common" should still be in use, but like with Legacy, those terms should have importance or community consensus behind it.
Also, terms like "rare" and "common" should still be in use, but like with Legacy, those terms should have importance or community consensus behind it.


Here is and example of how it could be in use if this RFC passes:
Here is an example of how it could be in use if this RFC passes:


'''Sources:''' This is perhaps the rarest logo on this wiki. 15 years of searching have yielded only a partial recording.
'''Sources:''' This is perhaps the rarest logo on this wiki. 15 years of searching have yielded only a partial recording.

Revision as of 20:18, 29 August 2023

Why rename Availability?

I wasn't aware of a recent revamp until very recently. But I would've support it as I'm sick of the Availability scale.

Anyways given its current direction, I honestly think it should be renamed into something like "Sources". The "Availability" term just sounds kinda ridiculous at this point, so I think it needed to be changed to sound more simple and better.

Also, terms like "rare" and "common" should still be in use, but like with Legacy, those terms should have importance or community consensus behind it.

Here is an example of how it could be in use if this RFC passes:

Sources: This is perhaps the rarest logo on this wiki. 15 years of searching have yielded only a partial recording.

Rainbow Puppy (talk) 20:17, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Support

Abstain

Oppose

Comments

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.