AVID:Requests for Comment/Controversial logos section: Difference between revisions

From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
Compooper (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Archive top|[[AVID:SNOW|SNOW]] close. This request has {{Rejected|failed}}. [[User:Compooper|Compooper]] ([[User talk:Compooper|talk]]) 00:13, 10 February 2023 (UTC)}}
==Controversial logos==
==Controversial logos==
Some logos are controversial, for many reasons. How about we do a category containing these type of logos? Is this also opinionated?
Some logos are controversial, for many reasons. How about we do a category containing these type of logos? Is this also opinionated?
Line 23: Line 24:
[[Category:Requests for Comment]]
[[Category:Requests for Comment]]
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__

:It's just that your ideas tend to be the ones we want to avoid. CLG Wiki was infamous for being way too opinionated. This is one such idea. [[File:T807sig.png|50px|link=User:Trevor807]] '''·''' '''[[User talk:Trevor807|Talk]]''' '''·''' '''[[Special:Contributions/Trevor807|Edits]]''' 22:19, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
{{Archive bottom}}

Latest revision as of 00:13, 10 February 2023


Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.