AVID:Requests for Comment/Controversial logos section

Controversial logos

Some logos are controversial, for many reasons. How about we do a category containing these type of logos? Is this also opinionated?

Support

1. Support (The Third Place) 13:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Oppose Yeah it is. It feels more like a CLG Wiki thing. IAmThe789Guy (talk) 13:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
2. Oppose We're called Audiovisual Identity Database, not Logo Reception Wiki. (Lets chat!) 13:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
3. Oppose we shouldn't have redundant categories. Logohub (talk) 13:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
4. Oppose Per everyone Compooper (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
5. Oppose Per all. Also, please make sure that you will create a RfC without unnecessary categories thing. Cattotld (talk) 13:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
6. Oppose Unconstitutional. ∞~𝙄𝙣𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮-𝙍𝙤𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙩𝙨~∞ (꧁𝙏𝙖𝙡𝙠 𝙋𝙖𝙜𝙚꧂) | (꧁𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙨꧂) 14:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
7. Oppose As per everyone above (Talk to Me!) 16:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
8. Oppose Doctorine Dark (talk) 16:34, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
9. Oppose. We are not the Reception Wikis. Dominicmgm (talk) 17:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
10. Oppose For a while I thought this was for logos with controversial content (gore, sexuality), but we have the content warning guidances and categories for those. SnowflakesOmega (talk) 21:49, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
11. Oppose per everybody else. This is something CLG Wiki and Qualitipedia would do. We're neither. · Talk · Edits 22:17, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments

 Comment: Is there anything I do an RfC for which isn't hated by everyone? Sonicfan19198282 (talk) 18:38, 9 February 2023 (UTC)