AVID:Requests for Comment/Discard "same as the (x) logo" descriptions

Discard "same as the (x) logo" descriptions

This idea was originally suggested by logoarto as "they come off as lazy and just prompt the reader to go to another page". Their original suggestion was basically was basically "the generic ID with the station logo on it" in the Visuals section but with the Technique, Audio and Availability not being "same as the (x) ID" (see here), but then later expanded into what seems to be a copy-paste description of the logo with modifications made to describe the altered logo. Having liked their new idea, I made three mockup images to give you a basic idea of what we could do with them. Gilby1385 (talk) 15:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Option 1: Eradicate "same as..." altogether and describe the visuals (copypasting) as they appear in the logo

Support (1)

Support Very much needed to eliminate laziness. Also, same as the (x) logo descriptions look off compared to the rest of a page. Strong support for this! (That guy who edits the Disney Home Video Bumpers pages) 13:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Support Ashley Taylor ft. Cure Finale (soulbond friend) and CW/RB (account manager w/ shared pet) (talk) 13:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Support Logoarto (talk) 13:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Support an easy fix that doesn't come across as lazy. Has my support. EMG/Ram (She/They) (Let's Chat!) 13:57, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Support I've actually made a few efforts to remove these from pages in recent times, the fix can literally be as lazy as copying the description from the logo that is being redirected to. I also wouldn't be opposed to the "same as X logo" being kept just to reference "Hey, this logo is also the same as this one", SO LONG AS a full description is available and the user doesn't have to go to another page to read the description for the logo. Luke2505 (talk) 15:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Support This is what I will probably accept in this RfC, for me, putting this on pages that look like the other logo seem like they were created out of laziness and in a hurry, so I accept this. Tortuga Tonta Prods. (AKA Mr. Vadimon) (Formerly TPatKB) (this is my, yes, MY talk page) 15:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Support I've already been in favor of this idea. · Talk · Edits 21:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Support If there's one thing I'd generalize about readers, I don't think they would like to navigate to another page just to read a description. This just causes information overload when all of it could simply be restated on the same page without any issue. This saves time and is more practical. Compooper (talk) 00:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Support per everyone else. Nothing else to really comment here on my part. VPJHuk (talk) 07:04, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Support yes. 16:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC)