AVID:Requests for Comment/Discontinue use of the Rollbacker role

Discontinue use of the Rollbacker role

With the introduction of the Moderator role, having a role solely for rollbacking seems to be mostly useless, as most people would be more likely to apply for moderator instead. With this in mind, I think keeping the role in use would be a waste, as to me, it's clear nobody is going to use it. What do you all think? (Lets chat!) 05:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Support

1. Support most people would probably go for mod rather than rollback. Logohub (talk) 06:42, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
2. Support this role is useless ForcedExcess26 (talk) 08:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
3. Support as rollbacker is made redundant by a full on moderation team, and the use of the moderation extension which minimizes the sort of things you'd actually use rollback for. --Raidarr (talk) 08:38, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
4. Support I think the Rollbacker role is just a waste of time. I don't know why it even exists! (Talk to Me!) 08:45, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

   It's legit just a holdover from when we didn't have the moderator role (Lets chat!) 05:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

5. Support because Rollback is pretty much deprecated by the wiki at this point Compooper (talk) 12:09, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
6. Support Doctorine Dark (talk) 11:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
7. Support per others. · Talk · Edits 12:08, 14 April 2023 (UTC)