AVID:Requests for Comment/Image licence bot
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
The following discussion is closed.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
- Closing as Failed per author request. (Lets chat!) 07:16, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Image licence bot
Should we make a bot to add licences to existing images that were uploaded before licences were introduced? (Talk to Me!) 11:52, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Support
Abstain
Oppose
- Oppose per EMG. A bot can't look at an image and go something like "hey, this is a TV logo!" Adding licenses is a human task. Dominicmgm (talk) 14:09, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per both. Sounds like a great idea in concept, but the main questions are: How will this be actually implemented, and how will it know if the capture is from a film, television show, and possibly fake? (Discussion area ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 14:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. Sounds good on paper but how is a bot going to spot these and sort the tag. Maybe a bot that can categorize the unlicensed captures for us to mark. (Talk!) 14:26, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- That sounds like a better idea! I might get this RfC closed and start a new one with your idea! (Talk to Me!) 16:34, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Comments
Comment: I'm pretty sure a bot wouldn’t be capable of this, as to a bot, the images would just be images. It wouldn’t know which license to put on an image, as it wouldn’t be able to tell what kind of logo it is. (Lets chat!) 12:55, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- The idea itself is awesome, and it would work on paper, but I don't think it would work in practice. (Lets chat!) 12:56, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Comment: Can I have this closed, please? (Talk to Me!) 16:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.