AVID:Requests for Comment/Logo Misconceptions: Difference between revisions
From the Audiovisual Identity Database, the motion graphics museum
Content deleted Content added
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===Support=== |
===Support=== |
||
{{Support}} [[File:Charlie_signature_AVID.png|200px|link=User:Charlie Fiddlesticks]] ([[User talk:Charlie Fiddlesticks|• '''USER TALK!''' •]]) 18:52, 24 December 2023 (UTC) |
#{{Support}} [[File:Charlie_signature_AVID.png|200px|link=User:Charlie Fiddlesticks]] ([[User talk:Charlie Fiddlesticks|• '''USER TALK!''' •]]) 18:52, 24 December 2023 (UTC) |
||
===Abstain=== |
===Abstain=== |
Revision as of 18:59, 24 December 2023
Logo Misconceptions
This was suggested a couple of times on the Discord server. Examples can include the Dan Curtis Productions logo being claimed to have had its own background (it's actually superimposed in the credits), as well as that 3-G Home Video logo that was said to have been as loud as its earliest known capture was (the capture itself was faulty). Who's with me? Gilby1385 (talk) 17:56, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Support
- Support (• USER TALK! •) 18:52, 24 December 2023 (UTC)